<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Fola Articles</title><description>Plain-English breakdowns of every USCIS memo, DOS cable, and DHS rule that touches immigration practice. Educational content only — not legal advice.</description><link>https://articles.folaform.com/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>Visa Bulletin: Final Action Date vs Date for Filing, and When DOS Flips the DFF Toggle</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-bulletin-fad-vs-dff-toggle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-bulletin-fad-vs-dff-toggle/</guid><description>What the two date charts in the monthly Visa Bulletin actually mean, when USCIS lets adjustment applicants use the Dates for Filing chart, and how DOS makes the call.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>dates-for-filing</category><category>final-action-date</category><category>priority-date</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-212 Permission to Reapply After Removal: When It&apos;s Required and the Discretionary Factors</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-212-permission-to-reapply-after-removal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-212-permission-to-reapply-after-removal/</guid><description>Who needs an I-212 consent to reapply after a prior removal — and the BIA&apos;s Tin and Mendez-Moralez factors that govern the discretionary decision.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-212</category><category>consent-to-reapply</category><category>212a9a</category><category>removal</category><category>matter-of-tin</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-2 and EB-3 Cross-Chargeability: Using a Spouse&apos;s Birth Country to Escape Retrogression</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-eb-3-cross-chargeability-spouse-birth-country/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-eb-3-cross-chargeability-spouse-birth-country/</guid><description>How INA § 202(b) lets an India- or China-born EB-2 / EB-3 principal charge to a spouse&apos;s country of birth, with the timing and proof the consulate and USCIS expect.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cross-chargeability</category><category>eb-2</category><category>eb-3</category><category>priority-date</category><category>retrogression</category><category>ina-202b</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-2 ROW, India, and China: Priority-Date Math and Forecasting When a Date Goes Current</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-priority-date-math-india-china-row/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-priority-date-math-india-china-row/</guid><description>How the EB-2 annual cap, per-country limits, and unused-family-preference spillover combine to set the EB-2 cut-off dates for India, China, and the Rest of the World.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-2</category><category>priority-date</category><category>india</category><category>china</category><category>retrogression</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>ina-203b</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-3 to EB-2 Upgrade: Porting a Priority Date Through a Second PERM and I-140</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-3-to-eb-2-upgrade-porting-second-perm-i-140/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-3-to-eb-2-upgrade-porting-second-perm-i-140/</guid><description>Why employers file a second PERM and I-140 to upgrade an employee from EB-3 to EB-2 — how 8 CFR 204.5(e) priority-date porting works and what USCIS demands as proof.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-2</category><category>eb-3</category><category>upgrade</category><category>priority-date</category><category>porting</category><category>perm</category><category>i-140</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Family Preference Categories F1, F2A, F2B, F3, F4 — Eligibility and Priority-Date Cuts</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/family-preference-categories-f1-f2a-f2b-f3-f4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/family-preference-categories-f1-f2a-f2b-f3-f4/</guid><description>How the four family-preference categories work under INA § 203(a), who falls in which, the annual caps that drive each line, and how F2A&apos;s spousal rule differs from the others.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>family-preference</category><category>f1</category><category>f2a</category><category>f2b</category><category>f3</category><category>f4</category><category>priority-date</category><category>ina-203a</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-601A Provisional Unlawful-Presence Waiver: Eligibility Before the Consular Interview</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-601a-provisional-unlawful-presence-waiver/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-601a-provisional-unlawful-presence-waiver/</guid><description>Who qualifies for the I-601A in-country waiver, what the 2016 and 2022 expansions changed, and how the provisional approval interacts with the consular interview.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-601a</category><category>provisional-waiver</category><category>unlawful-presence</category><category>212a9b</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Reading the DOS Visa Bulletin: Family vs Employment Charts and the Country Columns</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/reading-the-visa-bulletin-family-employment-charts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/reading-the-visa-bulletin-family-employment-charts/</guid><description>A working guide to the State Department&apos;s monthly Visa Bulletin — the family and employment charts, the country columns, and how to translate priority dates into wait estimates.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>priority-date</category><category>family-based</category><category>employment-based</category><category>cross-chargeability</category><category>chargeability</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>INA §212(a)(4) Public Charge at the Consular Stage: DS-5540 and DOS&apos;s Reading of &apos;Totality&apos;</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/public-charge-consular-ds-5540/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/public-charge-consular-ds-5540/</guid><description>What DOS actually weighs under public charge after the 2022 USCIS rule reset — and how the DS-5540 sits inside the totality-of-circumstances analysis at post.</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>public-charge</category><category>ds-5540</category><category>212a4</category><category>i-864</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>INA §214(b) Refusal: Overcoming the Presumption of Immigrant Intent</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/214b-refusal-overcoming-immigrant-intent-presumption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/214b-refusal-overcoming-immigrant-intent-presumption/</guid><description>Why nearly every B, F, and J refusal is a 214(b) — and the FAM-grounded ways to rebut the presumption on the next attempt.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>214b</category><category>nonimmigrant-intent</category><category>b1-b2</category><category>f1</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The Consular Interview: What to Bring, What They Ask, and the 221(g) Limbo</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/consular-interview-221g-administrative-processing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/consular-interview-221g-administrative-processing/</guid><description>A FAM-grounded walkthrough of the consular window — the documents posts actually look at, the questions officers actually ask, and what to do when you walk out with a colored slip.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>consular-interview</category><category>221g</category><category>administrative-processing</category><category>ds-160</category><category>ds-260</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DS-260 Immigrant Visa Application: The NVC Packet and Follow-to-Join Timing</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ds-260-nvc-packet-follow-to-join/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ds-260-nvc-packet-follow-to-join/</guid><description>How the National Visa Center sequences fees, civil documents, and the DS-260 — plus the follow-to-join rules that keep spouses and children eligible.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ds-260</category><category>nvc</category><category>immigrant-visas</category><category>follow-to-join</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DS-160 Nonimmigrant Visa Application: Common Rejection Reasons and How to Fix Them</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ds-160-common-rejection-reasons/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ds-160-common-rejection-reasons/</guid><description>A practical guide to the DS-160 errors that quietly trigger 221(g) holds, mandatory reschedules, and 214(b) refusals — and what to do before you sign.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ds-160</category><category>nonimmigrant-visas</category><category>consular-processing</category><category>ceac</category><category>221g</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>H-4 EAD — Eligibility, the Two Filing Bases, and the Save-Jobs-USA Litigation That Refuses to Die</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h-4-ead-eligibility-and-litigation-status/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h-4-ead-eligibility-and-litigation-status/</guid><description>How H-4 spouses of H-1B workers get work authorization — the I-140 approved or AC21 §106(a) basis — and where the long-running Save Jobs USA challenge stands as of the 2025 D.C. Circuit affirmance.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>h-4</category><category>h-4-ead</category><category>h-1b-spouse</category><category>i-765</category><category>ac21</category><category>save-jobs-usa</category><category>litigation</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EOIR Pre-Hearing Conferences: Using Stipulations, PD, and Continuances to Reshape the Case</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eoir-pre-hearing-conferences-stipulations-pd-continuances/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eoir-pre-hearing-conferences-stipulations-pd-continuances/</guid><description>Pre-hearing conferences under 8 C.F.R. §1003.21 are EOIR&apos;s underused settlement and case-management tool. Used well, they narrow the issues, secure stipulations, and create space for prosecutorial discretion.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>pre-hearing-conference</category><category>stipulations</category><category>continuances</category><category>prosecutorial-discretion</category><category>l-a-b-r</category><category>coronado-acevedo</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DV-2026 Diversity Visa Lottery: Application Window, Selection, and NVC Follow-Up</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dv-diversity-visa-lottery-dv-2026-process/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dv-diversity-visa-lottery-dv-2026-process/</guid><description>How the DV-2026 Diversity Visa program works — the October–November 2024 entry window, the May 2025 KCC notification, and the documentary checklist between selection and visa issuance.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>diversity-visa</category><category>dv-2026</category><category>dv-lottery</category><category>ina-203c</category><category>kcc</category><category>dos</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Motions to Reopen: The Number and Time Bars, and the Changed-Country-Conditions Door</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/motions-to-reopen-changed-country-conditions-mata-tolling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/motions-to-reopen-changed-country-conditions-mata-tolling/</guid><description>INA §240(c)(7) gives a respondent one motion to reopen, filed within 90 days. The statutory exception for changed country conditions is the door that asylum, withholding, and CAT motions continue to walk through.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>motion-to-reopen</category><category>ina-240</category><category>changed-country-conditions</category><category>equitable-tolling</category><category>sua-sponte</category><category>mata-v-lynch</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-1 CPT — Curricular Practical Training, the &quot;Integral to Curriculum&quot; Test, and the 12-Month Full-Time Bar</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-cpt-integral-curriculum-12-month-bar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-cpt-integral-curriculum-12-month-bar/</guid><description>How CPT actually works — the DSO authorizes it, no USCIS adjudication, no EAD — and the 12-month full-time threshold that eliminates OPT eligibility at the same degree level.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-1</category><category>cpt</category><category>curricular-practical-training</category><category>dso</category><category>internship</category><category>co-op</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-1 Student Visa — Initial Issuance, the SEVIS I-20, and the 30-Day Arrival Window</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-initial-issuance-sevis-i-20-30-day-arrival-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-initial-issuance-sevis-i-20-30-day-arrival-window/</guid><description>How a prospective F-1 student moves from school admission to a valid I-20, a visa stamp, and a lawful U.S. entry within the 30-day window — and the three places that sequence most often breaks.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-1</category><category>student-visa</category><category>sevis</category><category>i-20</category><category>initial-issuance</category><category>sevp</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-2, J-2, and M-2 Dependents — What Spouses and Children Can and Cannot Do in the United States</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-2-j-2-m-2-dependent-rules-work-study-restrictions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-2-j-2-m-2-dependent-rules-work-study-restrictions/</guid><description>The three dependent statuses look similar on the visa foil but diverge sharply on work authorization, study, and travel — here&apos;s the rulebook for each, with the J-2 EAD as the standout.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-2</category><category>j-2</category><category>m-2</category><category>dependents</category><category>j-2-ead</category><category>i-765</category><category>study-restrictions</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>J-1 §212(e) — The Two-Year Home Residency Requirement and the Five Waiver Paths</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/j-1-212e-two-year-home-residency-waiver-paths/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/j-1-212e-two-year-home-residency-waiver-paths/</guid><description>When §212(e) actually attaches, what it blocks, and the five waiver bases — no-objection, interested government agency, persecution, exceptional hardship, and Conrad 30 for physicians.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>j-1</category><category>212e</category><category>home-residency-requirement</category><category>waiver</category><category>ds-3035</category><category>conrad-30</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>J-1 Exchange Visitor — Picking the Right Category Among Research Scholar, Intern, Trainee, and Summer Work Travel</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/j-1-exchange-visitor-categories-research-intern-trainee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/j-1-exchange-visitor-categories-research-intern-trainee/</guid><description>The J-1 is one visa with sixteen subcategories. Picking the wrong one breaks duration, sponsor obligations, and the §212(e) two-year home residency requirement — here&apos;s how to choose.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>j-1</category><category>exchange-visitor</category><category>ds-2019</category><category>research-scholar</category><category>intern</category><category>trainee</category><category>summer-work-travel</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>M-1 Vocational Student Visa — How It Differs From F-1, and the Very Narrow Work-Authorization Path</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/m-1-vocational-student-visa-vs-f-1-part-time-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/m-1-vocational-student-visa-vs-f-1-part-time-work/</guid><description>When the M-1 is the right visa for a vocational program — the SEVIS I-20 mechanics, the program-length cap, and why M-1 students cannot work except in narrow post-completion practical training.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>m-1</category><category>vocational-student</category><category>sevis</category><category>i-20</category><category>practical-training</category><category>i-538</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>BIA Appeals: The 30-Day Window and What Makes a Brief Reviewable</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/bia-appeals-30-day-window-reviewable-brief/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/bia-appeals-30-day-window-reviewable-brief/</guid><description>The 30-day filing window for a BIA appeal under 8 C.F.R. §1003.38(b) is jurisdictional. The brief that follows is the case — a brief that fails to identify specific factual or legal error gets summary affirmance.</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>bia-appeal</category><category>eoir-26</category><category>30-day-deadline</category><category>briefing</category><category>summary-affirmance</category><category>burbano</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Asylum-Only Proceedings: VWP Overstays, Stowaways, and the Limits of EOIR Jurisdiction</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/asylum-only-proceedings-vwp-stowaways-withholding-only/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/asylum-only-proceedings-vwp-stowaways-withholding-only/</guid><description>Asylum-only proceedings are EOIR&apos;s narrow track for noncitizens who have already lost their right to a full removal hearing — VWP overstays, stowaways, certain administrative-removal respondents. The procedural rules look like removal practice; the substantive scope is much smaller.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>asylum-only</category><category>vwp</category><category>stowaways</category><category>withholding-only</category><category>reinstatement</category><category>administrative-removal</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Voluntary Departure Under INA §240B: The Pre-Conclusion vs Post-Conclusion Choice</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/voluntary-departure-pre-vs-post-conclusion-240b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/voluntary-departure-pre-vs-post-conclusion-240b/</guid><description>Voluntary departure under INA §240B comes in two flavors with different time limits, bond requirements, and waiver consequences. Picking the wrong one — or missing the departure deadline — costs the client a decade of relief.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>voluntary-departure</category><category>ina-240b</category><category>pre-conclusion</category><category>post-conclusion</category><category>dada</category><category>bond</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>T Visa: Form I-914 for Trafficking Survivors and What &apos;Law Enforcement Cooperation&apos; Really Means</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/t-visa-form-i-914-trafficking-victims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/t-visa-form-i-914-trafficking-victims/</guid><description>How USCIS reads the T visa cooperation requirement after the 2024 final rule — sex and labor trafficking, the exception categories, and the path to LPR.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>t-visa</category><category>i-914</category><category>trafficking</category><category>tvpa</category><category>law-enforcement-cooperation</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Non-LPR Cancellation Under INA §240A(b): The Ten-Year Bar and the Hardship Mountain</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cancellation-of-removal-non-lpr-240a-b-hardship/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cancellation-of-removal-non-lpr-240a-b-hardship/</guid><description>Non-LPR cancellation under INA §240A(b)(1) requires ten years of continuous physical presence, good moral character, no disqualifying conviction, and &apos;exceptional and extremely unusual hardship&apos; to a qualifying relative. The hardship element is where most cases die.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cancellation-of-removal</category><category>non-lpr</category><category>ina-240a-b</category><category>hardship</category><category>andazola</category><category>monreal</category><category>recinas</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Form I-765 EAD: How (c)(9), (c)(8), (c)(33), and (c)(36) Actually Get Filed Wrong</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-765-ead-categories-common-filing-mistakes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-765-ead-categories-common-filing-mistakes/</guid><description>Four of the highest-volume Employment Authorization categories — adjustment-pending, asylum-pending, DACA, and compelling-circumstances — and the specific filing errors that produce the most RFEs and rejections.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ead</category><category>i-765</category><category>c9</category><category>c8</category><category>c33</category><category>c36</category><category>daca</category><category>compelling-circumstances</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The 540-Day EAD Automatic Extension: Scope, Limits, and What Employers Actually Get to Rely On</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ead-automatic-extension-540-day-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ead-automatic-extension-540-day-rule/</guid><description>USCIS made the 540-day automatic extension of employment authorization permanent on April 8, 2024. Here is who it covers, who it does not, and what an employer can put in the I-9 file.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ead</category><category>i-765</category><category>automatic-extension</category><category>540-day-rule</category><category>i-9</category><category>employment-authorization</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-485 Adjustment of Status: Eligibility Windows for IR-1, IR-2, and IR-5 Cases</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-485-eligibility-ir-1-ir-2-ir-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-485-eligibility-ir-1-ir-2-ir-5/</guid><description>Three immediate-relative categories — IR-1 spouse, IR-2 child, IR-5 parent — share one Form I-485 but very different eligibility analyses. Here is what each window requires.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-485</category><category>ir-1</category><category>ir-2</category><category>ir-5</category><category>adjustment-of-status</category><category>immediate-relative</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Cancellation of Removal for LPRs Under INA §240A(a): The Seven-Five Rule and Its Quiet Traps</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cancellation-of-removal-lpr-240a-a-seven-five-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cancellation-of-removal-lpr-240a-a-seven-five-rule/</guid><description>An LPR&apos;s path to cancellation under INA §240A(a) sounds mechanical — seven years continuous residence, five years as a green card holder, no aggravated felony. The litigation lives in the qualifiers.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cancellation-of-removal</category><category>lpr</category><category>ina-240a</category><category>stop-time</category><category>aggravated-felony</category><category>discretion</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>USCIS Premium Processing After the 2024 Fee Rule: $2,805 for Most I-129 and I-140s, 15 Business Days, and What That Clock Actually Buys</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/premium-processing-2024-fee-structure-15-business-days/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/premium-processing-2024-fee-structure-15-business-days/</guid><description>The February 2024 fee rule pushed I-129 and most I-140 premium processing to $2,805 and aligned timelines across categories. The 15-business-day clock buys an action, not an approval.</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>premium-processing</category><category>i-907</category><category>2024-fee-rule</category><category>i-129</category><category>i-140</category><category>8-usc-1356u</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The 2024 USCIS Fee Rule — biometrics bundled in, concurrent EAD/AP at $0, and what that means for your AOS package</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/2024-fee-rule-bundled-biometrics-and-concurrent-aos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/2024-fee-rule-bundled-biometrics-and-concurrent-aos/</guid><description>USCIS&apos;s 2024 fee rule reshaped the math for adjustment-of-status filings: biometrics fold into the I-485, and the I-765 and I-131 are free when filed concurrently. Here&apos;s the new total and how to plan around it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-485</category><category>i-130</category><category>i-765</category><category>i-131</category><category>fees</category><category>2024-fee-rule</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-1 OPT — The 12-Month Post-Completion Clock and the 90-Day Unemployment Limit</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-opt-post-completion-12-month-90-day-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-opt-post-completion-12-month-90-day-unemployment/</guid><description>How standard post-completion OPT works after the 2024 fee rule — the application window, the 12-month authorization period, and the 90-day unemployment cap that ends F-1 status if you cross it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-1</category><category>opt</category><category>post-completion-opt</category><category>i-765</category><category>ead</category><category>unemployment</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation: federal appellate review of immigration cases</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/doj-office-of-immigration-litigation-federal-appeals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/doj-office-of-immigration-litigation-federal-appeals/</guid><description>OIL defends the government in petitions for review of BIA decisions across all twelve circuits — and its appellate posture quietly shapes the precedent every removal-defense practitioner relies on.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>oil</category><category>doj</category><category>federal-appeals</category><category>petition-for-review</category><category>circuit-courts</category><category>bia</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Schedule A Shortage-Occupation List: How Pre-Certification Bypasses PERM, and What the 2023 RFI Means for Expansion</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/schedule-a-shortage-list-mechanics-bypassing-perm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/schedule-a-shortage-list-mechanics-bypassing-perm/</guid><description>How DOL&apos;s Schedule A pre-certification mechanism at 20 CFR 656.5 and 20 CFR 656.15 lets qualifying occupations skip ETA-9089 recruitment entirely — the regulatory architecture, the 2023 RFI on expanding the list, and what an expansion would mean for employers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>schedule-a</category><category>perm</category><category>labor-certification</category><category>shortage-occupation</category><category>dol</category><category>rfi</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>E-Verify for federal contractors, state mandates, and the TNC procedure</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-verify-federal-contractor-state-mandates-tnc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-verify-federal-contractor-state-mandates-tnc/</guid><description>FAR 52.222-54 forces federal contractors onto E-Verify, state mandates layer on, and every enrolled employer lives by the eight-federal-workday Tentative Nonconfirmation clock.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>e-verify</category><category>i-9</category><category>federal-contractor</category><category>tnc</category><category>far-52-222-54</category><category>state-mandates</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Temporary Protected Status (TPS): designation criteria, registration windows, and work authorization</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tps-designation-registration-work-authorization/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tps-designation-registration-work-authorization/</guid><description>A working explainer on how DHS designates a country for Temporary Protected Status under INA §244, how registration windows operate, and how TPS holders obtain and maintain employment authorization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>tps</category><category>humanitarian</category><category>work-authorization</category><category>ina-244</category><category>designation</category><category>ead</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-539 Change of Status: Timing, Processing-Time Risk, and the Status Gap</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-539-change-of-status-timing-processing-gap-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-539-change-of-status-timing-processing-gap-risk/</guid><description>Form I-539 changes nonimmigrant status from inside the U.S. Filing before the current status expires preserves authorized stay, but processing times can stretch past a year — here is the framework.</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-539</category><category>change-of-status</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>b-2</category><category>f-1</category><category>h-4</category><category>processing-time</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>ICE Detainers Under INA §287(d): How State and Local Cooperation Policies Reshape the Detainer Landscape</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ice-detainers-ina-287d-state-cooperation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ice-detainers-ina-287d-state-cooperation/</guid><description>What a Form I-247A detainer is, the INA §287(d) statutory framework, the 48-hour rule, and how state and local sanctuary or cooperation policies determine whether the detainer is honored.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ice</category><category>detainers</category><category>287d</category><category>sanctuary</category><category>federalism</category><category>immigration-enforcement</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-765 (c)(33): DACA Renewals, the 2022 Final Rule, and the Fifth Circuit</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-765-c33-daca-renewal-only-posture-and-fifth-circuit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-765-c33-daca-renewal-only-posture-and-fifth-circuit/</guid><description>DACA is in renewal-only posture. Initial requests are accepted but not processed; renewal EADs are granted in two-year increments. Here is the litigation status, the renewal window, and the documentary record.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>daca</category><category>i-765</category><category>c33</category><category>fifth-circuit</category><category>renewal</category><category>ead</category><category>deferred-action</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-751: Joint Petition vs Waiver After Divorce, Abuse, or Hardship</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-751-joint-petition-vs-waiver/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-751-joint-petition-vs-waiver/</guid><description>Removing conditions on a marriage-based green card has four paths — joint petition or three waivers — and the right one is the one the facts support. Here is how to pick.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-751</category><category>conditional-residence</category><category>waiver</category><category>divorce</category><category>extreme-cruelty</category><category>extreme-hardship</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DOS Visa Reciprocity Schedule: Country-by-Country Validity, Fees, and the Reciprocity Principle in Practice</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dos-visa-reciprocity-schedule-ina-281/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dos-visa-reciprocity-schedule-ina-281/</guid><description>How the State Department&apos;s Visa Reciprocity Schedule sets validity periods, entry limits, and fees per visa class on a country-by-country basis under INA §281, and why two applicants in the same visa category can face dramatically different terms.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>visa-reciprocity</category><category>dos</category><category>ina-281</category><category>nonimmigrant-visa</category><category>visa-fees</category><category>validity-period</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Refugee Resettlement vs Asylee Status: I-730 Follow-to-Join and the I-485 to LPR</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/refugee-vs-asylee-i-730-to-lpr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/refugee-vs-asylee-i-730-to-lpr/</guid><description>Two paths to the same humanitarian outcome — how refugee admission and grants of asylum differ in process, family reunification via I-730, and adjustment to LPR.</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>refugee</category><category>asylee</category><category>i-730</category><category>i-485</category><category>follow-to-join</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>AC21 §104(c): The 3-Year H-1B Extension Beyond the 6-Year Cap</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ac21-104c-3-year-h1b-extension-beyond-6-year-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ac21-104c-3-year-h1b-extension-beyond-6-year-cap/</guid><description>When an approved I-140 in an oversubscribed category traps an H-1B worker past year six, AC21 §104(c) provides a 3-year extension. Here is the eligibility test, the documentary record, and the most common denials.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ac21</category><category>h-1b</category><category>i-140</category><category>three-year-extension</category><category>priority-date</category><category>6-year-cap</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>AC21 §106(a): The 1-Year H-1B Extension on a Pending PERM or I-140</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ac21-106a-one-year-h1b-extension-pending-perm-i-140/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ac21-106a-one-year-h1b-extension-pending-perm-i-140/</guid><description>Section 106(a) of AC21 lets H-1B workers extend in one-year increments past the six-year cap if a PERM or I-140 has been pending for 365+ days. Here is the eligibility test and the §104(c) handoff.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ac21</category><category>h-1b</category><category>106a</category><category>perm</category><category>i-140</category><category>one-year-extension</category><category>six-year-cap</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>ICE worksite enforcement: I-9 audits, NOI response, and the three-day rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ice-worksite-enforcement-noi-response/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/ice-worksite-enforcement-noi-response/</guid><description>ICE Homeland Security Investigations runs administrative I-9 audits via Notice of Inspection. Three business days to produce, ten to cure technical defects, and civil-penalty math built on substantive violations.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ice</category><category>hsi</category><category>i-9-audit</category><category>noi</category><category>worksite-enforcement</category><category>274a</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Form I-9 Employment Verification: Section 1/2/3 Traps and the 2023 Remote-Verification Rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/form-i9-section-traps-2023-remote-verification/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/form-i9-section-traps-2023-remote-verification/</guid><description>How the DHS 2023 alternative procedure to physical document examination works for E-Verify employers, and where Section 1, 2, and 3 of Form I-9 still trip employers up.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>form-i9</category><category>e-verify</category><category>employment-verification</category><category>remote-verification</category><category>dhs</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Advance Parole for AOS Applicants: When You Need It, and What Happens If You Travel Without It</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-advance-parole-aos-abandonment-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-advance-parole-aos-abandonment-risk/</guid><description>The Form I-131 advance parole document is what lets a pending adjustment-of-status applicant leave the United States without abandoning the I-485. Here is the rule, the exceptions, and the consequences of getting it wrong.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-131</category><category>advance-parole</category><category>i-485</category><category>adjustment-of-status</category><category>abandonment</category><category>travel</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-1 Reinstatement: The 5-Month Window and the No-Fault Standard</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-reinstatement-five-month-window-and-no-fault-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-reinstatement-five-month-window-and-no-fault-standard/</guid><description>An F-1 student who falls out of status has two paths: reinstatement via Form I-539 or departure and re-entry. The 5-month rule and the no-fault test decide which is available.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-1</category><category>reinstatement</category><category>i-539</category><category>sevis</category><category>no-fault</category><category>status-violation</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Form I-131 Re-Entry Permit: Preserving LPR Status Through Extended Absence</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-re-entry-permit-lpr-extended-absence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-re-entry-permit-lpr-extended-absence/</guid><description>An LPR who plans to spend more than a year abroad needs an I-131 re-entry permit filed and biometrics captured BEFORE departure. Here is the timing, the documentary record, and the abandonment trap.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-131</category><category>re-entry-permit</category><category>lpr</category><category>abandonment</category><category>biometrics</category><category>sb-1</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>9 FAM 302: How State Department Consular Officers Apply Visa Ineligibilities — and Where They Diverge from USCIS</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/9-fam-302-consular-ineligibility-uscis-divergence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/9-fam-302-consular-ineligibility-uscis-divergence/</guid><description>How 9 FAM 302 codifies the State Department&apos;s interpretation of INA §212(a) grounds of inadmissibility for visa adjudication, and the recurring pattern of consular denials after USCIS approval.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>9-fam</category><category>consular-processing</category><category>ineligibility</category><category>dos</category><category>ina-212a</category><category>visa-denial</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>E-1 treaty trader and E-2 treaty investor: what counts as qualifying trade or qualifying investment</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-1-e-2-treaty-trader-investor-qualifying-activity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-1-e-2-treaty-trader-investor-qualifying-activity/</guid><description>E-1 and E-2 share a treaty country list but split on what the beneficiary must establish — substantial trade volume for E-1, a substantial at-risk investment in an active US enterprise for E-2.</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>e-1</category><category>e-2</category><category>treaty-trader</category><category>treaty-investor</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>PERM Form ETA-9089: Process, Recruitment Timing, and Prevailing-Wage Determination</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-eta-9089-process/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-eta-9089-process/</guid><description>How DOL&apos;s PERM labor certification works in practice: the ETA-9141 prevailing-wage request, mandatory recruitment, and filing the electronic ETA-9089 in FLAG.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>perm</category><category>eta-9089</category><category>prevailing-wage</category><category>recruitment</category><category>labor-certification</category><category>flag</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Refugee Travel Document on Form I-131: Limits on Return to the Country of Feared Persecution</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-refugee-travel-document-return-to-persecution-country/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-131-refugee-travel-document-return-to-persecution-country/</guid><description>A refugee or asylee uses Form I-131 for a refugee travel document, not a re-entry permit. Returning to the country of feared persecution can terminate status. Here is the framework and the safe-travel checklist.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-131</category><category>refugee-travel-document</category><category>asylee</category><category>refugee</category><category>persecution</category><category>status-termination</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>R-1 nonimmigrant religious workers: the 2-year prior membership rule and the mandatory pre-approval site visit</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/r-1-religious-worker-nonimmigrant-2-year-membership-and-site-visits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/r-1-religious-worker-nonimmigrant-2-year-membership-and-site-visits/</guid><description>R-1 status is gated by a 2-year prior membership requirement and, for new petitioners, a mandatory pre-approval site visit by USCIS Fraud Detection and National Security.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>r-1</category><category>religious-worker</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>site-visit</category><category>fdns</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>USCIS Biometrics: ASC Appointments, Reuse Under 8 CFR §103.16, and What Triggers a New Visit</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uscis-biometrics-asc-appointments-reuse-policy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uscis-biometrics-asc-appointments-reuse-policy/</guid><description>USCIS biometrics drive the FBI background check on most petitions. The 2021 reuse policy and the H-4/L-2/E biometrics waiver cut wait times — but specific triggers still force a new ASC appointment.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>biometrics</category><category>application-support-center</category><category>8-cfr-103-16</category><category>fbi-name-check</category><category>h-4</category><category>reuse-policy</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CSPA Derivative Beneficiaries: How USCIS Calculates the Child&apos;s Age Today</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cspa-derivative-beneficiary-age-calculation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cspa-derivative-beneficiary-age-calculation/</guid><description>The Child Status Protection Act freezes a derivative beneficiary&apos;s age — but only if you run the math correctly under the 2023 USCIS policy alert that switched the trigger date.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cspa</category><category>i-130</category><category>derivative-beneficiary</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>aging-out</category><category>sought-to-acquire</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F2A vs F2B: Aging-Out Math and CSPA&apos;s &apos;Sought to Acquire&apos; Trap</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f2a-vs-f2b-aging-out-sought-to-acquire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f2a-vs-f2b-aging-out-sought-to-acquire/</guid><description>Whether an LPR&apos;s unmarried child stays in F2A or converts to F2B is the single most consequential variable in many family cases. Here is the math and the one-year filing trap.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f2a</category><category>f2b</category><category>cspa</category><category>aging-out</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>lpr</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CSPA and the I-130 Derivative Beneficiary: Reading the Statute the Way USCIS Does</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-cspa-derivative-beneficiary-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-cspa-derivative-beneficiary-rules/</guid><description>The Child Status Protection Act protects an I-130 derivative child from aging out — if the §203(h) formula, the &apos;sought to acquire&apos; rule, and the 2023 Dates for Filing trigger all line up.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cspa</category><category>i-130</category><category>derivative-beneficiary</category><category>ina-203h</category><category>sought-to-acquire</category><category>aging-out</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CBP One app: appointment scheduling, eligible processing, and policy direction</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cbp-one-app-appointment-scheduling-scope/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cbp-one-app-appointment-scheduling-scope/</guid><description>CBP One channels port-of-entry asylum processing into a smartphone-based appointment queue. The eligible population, the daily-slot math, and the rolling expansions all sit on a fragile policy footing.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cbp-one</category><category>cbp</category><category>port-of-entry</category><category>asylum</category><category>parole</category><category>title-8</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CHNV parole: the Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela process, supporter requirements, and the litigation landscape</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/chnv-parole-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/chnv-parole-program/</guid><description>How DHS structured the country-specific humanitarian parole processes for Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan nationals — and what the operative USCIS guidance requires of supporters and beneficiaries.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>chnv</category><category>parole</category><category>cuba</category><category>haiti</category><category>nicaragua</category><category>venezuela</category><category>i-134a</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>L-1A Intracompany Transferee: Manager or Executive Capacity, Qualifying Relationship, and the One-Year-Abroad Rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1a-intracompany-transferee-manager-executive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1a-intracompany-transferee-manager-executive/</guid><description>What USCIS actually asks for when adjudicating an L-1A petition: qualifying corporate relationship, manager-or-executive duties, and one year of foreign employment within the preceding three years.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>l-1a</category><category>intracompany-transferee</category><category>manager</category><category>executive</category><category>qualifying-relationship</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>DHS Secretary&apos;s Parole Authority Under INA §212(d)(5): Scope, Recent Programs, and the Limits Courts Have Begun to Mark</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dhs-secretary-parole-authority-ina-212d5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dhs-secretary-parole-authority-ina-212d5/</guid><description>How INA §212(d)(5) gives the Secretary of Homeland Security case-by-case parole authority for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit, and how recent country-specific programs and Texas-led litigation are reshaping the boundaries.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>parole</category><category>ina-212d5</category><category>chnv</category><category>uniting-for-ukraine</category><category>parole-in-place</category><category>dhs</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Humanitarian parole under INA §212(d)(5): from case-by-case grants to the Ukraine and CHNV programs</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/humanitarian-parole-212d5-ukraine-chnv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/humanitarian-parole-212d5-ukraine-chnv/</guid><description>How USCIS uses the §212(d)(5) parole authority to admit noncitizens outside the visa system, traced from individual humanitarian parole adjudications through Uniting for Ukraine and the CHNV process.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>humanitarian-parole</category><category>ina-212d5</category><category>uniting-for-ukraine</category><category>chnv</category><category>parole</category><category>i-134a</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>O-1B: extraordinary ability in the arts vs extraordinary achievement in film and TV</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/o-1b-arts-motion-picture-tv-consultation-letter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/o-1b-arts-motion-picture-tv-consultation-letter/</guid><description>O-1B splits into two evidentiary standards — &quot;extraordinary ability&quot; for the arts and the higher &quot;extraordinary achievement&quot; for motion picture and TV. The consultation letter rule is non-waivable.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>o-1b</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>arts</category><category>motion-picture</category><category>consultation-letter</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Public Charge Inadmissibility After the 2022 Final Rule: What Actually Triggers It</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/public-charge-ground-after-2022-final-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/public-charge-ground-after-2022-final-rule/</guid><description>The 2022 DHS public-charge rule replaced the 2019 Trump-era regime and tightened the totality-of-circumstances test. Here is what the rule actually counts, and what it ignores.</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>public-charge</category><category>i-485</category><category>ina-212</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>i-944</category><category>i-864</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>P-1 visas for athletes and entertainers: the &quot;internationally recognized&quot; standard and the group-tenure rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/p-1-athletes-entertainers-internationally-recognized/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/p-1-athletes-entertainers-internationally-recognized/</guid><description>P-1 sits one rung below O-1 in evidentiary difficulty. P-1B entertainment groups face a 1-year together and 75%-of-members rule with narrow exceptions.</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>p-1</category><category>p-1a</category><category>p-1b</category><category>athletes</category><category>entertainers</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): the policy framework, the 2022 final rule, and the litigation landscape</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/daca-current-litigation-status/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/daca-current-litigation-status/</guid><description>How DACA works as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion under DHS, what the August 2022 final rule changed, and where the Texas v. United States litigation has left the program&apos;s enforcement posture.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>daca</category><category>deferred-action</category><category>dreamers</category><category>texas-v-united-states</category><category>ead</category><category>prosecutorial-discretion</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>TPS travel: advance parole, the Arrabally rule, and the stop-time risks of leaving the United States</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tps-travel-advance-parole-arrabally-z-r-z-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tps-travel-advance-parole-arrabally-z-r-z-c/</guid><description>Why TPS holders should not assume international travel is risk-free, how advance parole interacts with the unlawful-presence bars, and where the post-Matter of Z-R-Z-C- landscape stands after the 2022 USCIS policy shift.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>tps</category><category>advance-parole</category><category>travel</category><category>unlawful-presence</category><category>arrabally</category><category>z-r-z-c</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The Asylum One-Year Filing Deadline and the Exceptions That Actually Get Granted</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/asylum-i-589-one-year-filing-deadline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/asylum-i-589-one-year-filing-deadline/</guid><description>How the I-589 one-year clock runs, which &apos;changed circumstances&apos; and &apos;extraordinary circumstances&apos; work in practice, and how to plead the exception.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>asylum</category><category>i-589</category><category>one-year-deadline</category><category>changed-circumstances</category><category>extraordinary-circumstances</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>APA Challenge to a USCIS Denial: When Agency Action Is &apos;Arbitrary and Capricious&apos; Under 5 U.S.C. §706(2)(A)</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/apa-challenge-federal-court-arbitrary-capricious-uscis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/apa-challenge-federal-court-arbitrary-capricious-uscis/</guid><description>The Administrative Procedure Act lets a federal court set aside agency action that is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. Threshold doctrines — final agency action, jurisdictional bars, and the State Farm hard-look test — decide whether the suit moves.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>apa</category><category>arbitrary-and-capricious</category><category>5-usc-706</category><category>federal-court</category><category>patel-v-garland</category><category>judicial-review</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Uniting for Ukraine: eligibility, the supporter model, and the parole-extension process after the two-year initial term</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uniting-for-ukraine-parole-extension/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uniting-for-ukraine-parole-extension/</guid><description>How the April 2022 Uniting for Ukraine process structures supporter-based parole for Ukrainian nationals, what the eligibility floor actually requires, and how USCIS handles re-parole at the end of the two-year term.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>uniting-for-ukraine</category><category>ukraine</category><category>parole</category><category>i-134a</category><category>re-parole</category><category>supporter</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>E-3 for Australian specialty-occupation workers: how it differs from the H-1B in practice</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-3-australian-specialty-occupation-distinctions-from-h-1b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/e-3-australian-specialty-occupation-distinctions-from-h-1b/</guid><description>The E-3 is the Australia-only specialty occupation visa. The 10,500 annual cap rarely binds, and post-2022 the spouse is work-authorized without an EAD card.</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>e-3</category><category>australia</category><category>specialty-occupation</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>work-authorization</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-5 After the 2022 Reform and Integrity Act: The $800K TEA Math, Set-Asides, and Concurrent I-526E / I-485 Filing</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-5-post-ria-2022-800k-tea-investment-math/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-5-post-ria-2022-800k-tea-investment-math/</guid><description>How the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (Pub. L. 117-103) reset the EB-5 investor program — the $800,000 TEA investment threshold, the rural / high-unemployment / infrastructure set-asides, and the concurrent-filing pathway under INA § 203(b)(5).</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-5</category><category>investor-visa</category><category>regional-center</category><category>ria-2022</category><category>i-526e</category><category>i-485</category><category>tea</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-5 Priority-Date Math: Set-Asides, the RIA 2022 Carve-Outs, and the Reserved Categories on the Visa Bulletin</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-5-priority-date-math-ria-set-asides/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-5-priority-date-math-ria-set-asides/</guid><description>How the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 split EB-5 into Unreserved and three reserved set-asides — Rural, High-Unemployment, Infrastructure — and how priority dates run inside each.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-5</category><category>ria</category><category>rural</category><category>high-unemployment</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>set-aside</category><category>priority-date</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>SIJS: State-Court Predicate Orders, the 21-Year Cutoff, and the Two-Step USCIS File</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/sijs-special-immigrant-juvenile-status/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/sijs-special-immigrant-juvenile-status/</guid><description>How Special Immigrant Juvenile Status is actually built — the state-court findings USCIS requires, the age and custody traps, and the long EB-4 wait.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>sijs</category><category>special-immigrant-juvenile</category><category>state-court</category><category>eb-4</category><category>children</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>VAWA Self-Petition: How Form I-360 Lets Survivors File Without Their Abuser</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/vawa-self-petition-form-i-360/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/vawa-self-petition-form-i-360/</guid><description>A practitioner-side guide to the VAWA I-360 self-petition for battered spouses, children, and parents — what to file, what to prove, and what trips most cases up.</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>vawa</category><category>i-360</category><category>self-petition</category><category>domestic-violence</category><category>humanitarian</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>O-1A Extraordinary Ability: Evidentiary Criteria for Sciences, Education, Business, and Athletics</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/o-1a-extraordinary-ability-evidentiary-criteria/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/o-1a-extraordinary-ability-evidentiary-criteria/</guid><description>What USCIS counts as &apos;extraordinary ability&apos; for the O-1A visa: the eight regulatory criteria, the 2022 STEM update, and the final-merits determination that decides borderline cases.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>o-1a</category><category>extraordinary-ability</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>stem</category><category>kazarian</category><category>final-merits-determination</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>L-2 Dependent EAD — Automatic Work Authorization Incident to Status After the 2021 Shergill Settlement</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-2-dependent-ead-automatic-work-authorization-2021-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-2-dependent-ead-automatic-work-authorization-2021-settlement/</guid><description>How the L-2 spouse went from filing an I-765 and waiting a year to having work authorization automatically incident to status — the November 2021 USCIS policy change, the I-94 annotation, and the day-one job-eligibility mechanics.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>l-2</category><category>l-2-ead</category><category>l-1-spouse</category><category>shergill</category><category>incident-to-status</category><category>i-94-annotation</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Afghan parolees: Operation Allies Welcome, the AAIA pathway, and what comes after the initial parole grant</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/afghan-parolees-oaw-aaia-pathway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/afghan-parolees-oaw-aaia-pathway/</guid><description>How DHS structured the 2021 Afghan parole admissions under Operation Allies Welcome, how the Afghan Adjustment Act framework differs from the SIV program, and what status options exist when the parole period ends.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>afghan-parolees</category><category>oaw</category><category>aaia</category><category>parole</category><category>asylum</category><category>siv</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Deferred Enforced Departure (DED): the history through Liberia, Hong Kong, and Venezuela</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/deferred-enforced-departure-history/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/deferred-enforced-departure-history/</guid><description>How Deferred Enforced Departure works as an executive-discretion tool distinct from TPS, traced through the Liberia DED chain since 1999, the August 2021 Hong Kong designation, and the brief Venezuela DED of January 2021.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ded</category><category>liberia</category><category>hong-kong</category><category>venezuela</category><category>executive-discretion</category><category>ead</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The U Visa, Form I-918, and the Five-Year Waitlist Practitioners Have to Plan Around</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/u-visa-form-i-918-and-the-waitlist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/u-visa-form-i-918-and-the-waitlist/</guid><description>A grounded guide to U nonimmigrant status — the qualifying-crime list, the law-enforcement certification, and how the statutory cap reshaped the entire pipeline.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>u-visa</category><category>i-918</category><category>crime-victims</category><category>certification</category><category>waitlist</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>USCIS NOID vs RFE: When the Agency Issues a Notice of Intent to Deny Instead of a Request for Evidence</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/noid-notice-of-intent-to-deny-vs-rfe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/noid-notice-of-intent-to-deny-vs-rfe/</guid><description>An RFE means the record is light. A NOID means USCIS has already formed an adverse view. The two instruments demand different responses — and missing the distinction sinks otherwise winnable cases.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>noid</category><category>notice-of-intent-to-deny</category><category>rfe</category><category>8-cfr-103-2</category><category>adjudication</category><category>uscis-policy-manual</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Responding to a USCIS RFE Under 8 CFR §103.2(b)(8): A Focused, Evidence-Only Playbook</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/rfe-response-8-cfr-103-2-b-8-focused-evidence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/rfe-response-8-cfr-103-2-b-8-focused-evidence/</guid><description>An RFE is not a chance to re-argue the case. It is a discrete evidentiary ask under 8 CFR §103.2(b)(8). Here is how to answer one without drifting.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfe</category><category>request-for-evidence</category><category>8-cfr-103-2</category><category>adjudication</category><category>uscis-policy-manual</category><category>evidence</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Withholding of Removal Under INA §241(b)(3): The Higher Bar When Asylum Is Out of Reach</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/withholding-of-removal-ina-241-b-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/withholding-of-removal-ina-241-b-3/</guid><description>Why withholding is the fallback when the one-year deadline, bars, or discretion sink asylum — and what &apos;more likely than not&apos; really requires.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>withholding-of-removal</category><category>ina-241</category><category>asylum-bars</category><category>defensive</category><category>eoir</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>USCIS Motion to Reopen vs Motion to Reconsider on Form I-290B: The 30-Day Window and Two Very Different Standards</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/motion-to-reopen-vs-motion-to-reconsider-i-290b-30-day-window/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/motion-to-reopen-vs-motion-to-reconsider-i-290b-30-day-window/</guid><description>On Form I-290B, a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider live under the same regulation but answer different questions. New facts vs legal error. The 33-day window and Matter of Cerna control.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-290b</category><category>motion-to-reopen</category><category>motion-to-reconsider</category><category>8-cfr-103-5</category><category>matter-of-cerna</category><category>adjudication</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>TN status under USMCA: the closed professional list and the degree-pairing trap</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tn-usmca-professional-list-and-degree-pairing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/tn-usmca-professional-list-and-degree-pairing/</guid><description>TN is gated by Appendix 2 of USMCA Chapter 16. The profession must be on the list AND the beneficiary&apos;s credential must match what that profession requires — &quot;close enough&quot; fails.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>tn</category><category>usmca</category><category>nafta</category><category>canada</category><category>mexico</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-130 Revocation: The §205 Grounds USCIS Uses to Pull Back an Approved Petition</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-revocation-section-205-grounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-revocation-section-205-grounds/</guid><description>An approved I-130 is not permanent. USCIS revokes under INA §205 every day — automatically in some cases, on notice in others. Here is what triggers each.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-130</category><category>revocation</category><category>ina-205</category><category>marriage-fraud</category><category>notice-of-intent-to-revoke</category><category>notice-of-intent-to-deny</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Defending an Approved I-140 or I-130 from a USCIS NOIR Under INA §205</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/noir-notice-of-intent-to-revoke-defending-approved-i-140-i-130/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/noir-notice-of-intent-to-revoke-defending-approved-i-140-i-130/</guid><description>An NOIR — notice of intent to revoke — is USCIS announcing it intends to undo an already-approved petition. The 33-day response window and the Matter of Estime good-and-sufficient-cause standard are unforgiving.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>noir</category><category>notice-of-intent-to-revoke</category><category>i-140</category><category>i-130</category><category>ina-205</category><category>ac21-portability</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Controlled-Substance Inadmissibility and the 30-Grams-of-Marijuana Exception</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/controlled-substance-inadmissibility-and-the-30-grams-marijuana-exception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/controlled-substance-inadmissibility-and-the-30-grams-marijuana-exception/</guid><description>INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) treats any controlled-substance conviction as inadmissible — with one narrow exception for a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana. Here&apos;s how the exception actually applies.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>controlled-substance</category><category>marijuana</category><category>cannabis</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>USCIS Service Center vs Field Office vs Lockbox: Which Form Goes Where Under 8 CFR §103.2</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uscis-service-center-vs-field-office-jurisdiction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/uscis-service-center-vs-field-office-jurisdiction/</guid><description>USCIS splits adjudication across three plumbing layers — Lockbox intake, Service Centers, and Field Offices. Sending a form to the wrong one delays the case by months. The PM Vol 1 Part A routing map is the source of truth.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>service-center</category><category>field-office</category><category>lockbox</category><category>jurisdiction</category><category>8-cfr-103-2</category><category>filing-locations</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The Notice to Appear After Bermudez-Cota: What an NTA Must Contain to Vest Jurisdiction</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/nta-bermudez-cota-jurisdiction-niz-chavez-stop-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/nta-bermudez-cota-jurisdiction-niz-chavez-stop-time/</guid><description>Matter of Bermudez-Cota, 27 I&amp;N Dec. 441 (BIA 2018), narrowed Pereira&apos;s reach and salvaged jurisdiction in pending removal cases. Here is what defense counsel must still check on every NTA before pleadings.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>nta</category><category>jurisdiction</category><category>bermudez-cota</category><category>pereira</category><category>stop-time</category><category>niz-chavez</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CBP Secondary Inspection: Your Client&apos;s Rights at the Port of Entry and the 100-Mile Border Zone</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cbp-secondary-inspection-counsel-and-100-mile-zone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cbp-secondary-inspection-counsel-and-100-mile-zone/</guid><description>What happens during CBP secondary inspection, why there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel at the port of entry, and how 8 CFR 287.1&apos;s 100-mile zone extends CBP authority deep into the interior.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cbp</category><category>secondary-inspection</category><category>port-of-entry</category><category>100-mile-zone</category><category>border-search</category><category>right-to-counsel</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>AAO Appeals: When the Administrative Appeals Office Is the Right Forum vs Going Straight to Federal Court</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/aao-administrative-appeals-office-when-to-appeal-vs-federal-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/aao-administrative-appeals-office-when-to-appeal-vs-federal-court/</guid><description>The AAO has jurisdiction over a defined slice of USCIS denials. Outside that slice — and inside it, when delay is the problem — federal-court APA or mandamus litigation is the right tool.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>aao</category><category>administrative-appeals-office</category><category>i-290b</category><category>8-cfr-103-3</category><category>apa-review</category><category>federal-court</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Firearms-Offense Deportability Under §237(a)(2)(C): The &apos;Any Felony or Misdemeanor&apos; Trigger and the Antique-Firearm Carve-Out</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/firearms-offense-deportability-237-a-2-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/firearms-offense-deportability-237-a-2-c/</guid><description>INA §237(a)(2)(C) makes a noncitizen LPR deportable for any firearms or destructive-device conviction — even a misdemeanor. Matter of Chairez-Castrejon sets the categorical analysis.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>firearms</category><category>deportability</category><category>categorical-approach</category><category>antique</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-140 Portability Under AC21 §106(c): Switching Employers 180 Days After I-485</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i140-portability-ac21-106c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i140-portability-ac21-106c/</guid><description>How AC21 §106(c) and INA §204(j) let an EB beneficiary change jobs once the I-485 has been pending 180 days, what &apos;same or similar occupation&apos; means, and how Form I-485 Supplement J fits in.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-140</category><category>ac21</category><category>portability</category><category>106c</category><category>204j</category><category>i-485</category><category>supplement-j</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Cuban Adjustment Act: The One-Year-and-a-Day Rule After Parole</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cuban-adjustment-act-one-year-and-a-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cuban-adjustment-act-one-year-and-a-day/</guid><description>How the 1966 Cuban Adjustment Act still works in 2026 — parole, physical presence, and the I-485 path that has no real analog in U.S. immigration law.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cuban-adjustment-act</category><category>parole</category><category>i-485</category><category>cuba</category><category>lpr</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-2 National Interest Waiver: Matter of Dhanasar&apos;s Three-Prong Framework</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-niw-matter-of-dhanasar-three-prong-framework/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-niw-matter-of-dhanasar-three-prong-framework/</guid><description>How the AAO&apos;s 2016 precedent decision Matter of Dhanasar replaced the NYSDOT framework for EB-2 national-interest-waiver petitions — substantial merit and national importance, well-positioned petitioner, and the on-balance benefit prong.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-2</category><category>niw</category><category>national-interest-waiver</category><category>dhanasar</category><category>aao</category><category>i-140</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude After Silva-Trevino II: The Categorical Approach Is Back</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cimt-silva-trevino-ii-categorical-approach/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cimt-silva-trevino-ii-categorical-approach/</guid><description>The BIA&apos;s 2016 Silva-Trevino decision restored the categorical approach for CIMT determinations and rejected the realistic-probability fact-finding the AG had grafted on in 2008. Here&apos;s what that means in practice.</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cimt</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>deportability</category><category>categorical-approach</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>False Claim to U.S. Citizenship Under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(ii): The Catastrophic Ground With No General Waiver</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/false-claim-to-us-citizenship-212-a-6-c-ii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/false-claim-to-us-citizenship-212-a-6-c-ii/</guid><description>A false claim to U.S. citizenship made on or after September 30, 1996, for any purpose or benefit under federal or state law, is a permanent inadmissibility and deportability ground — with no §212(i) waiver.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>false-claim</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>deportability</category><category>i-9</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Crime of Domestic Violence Deportability Under §237(a)(2)(E): The Categorical Approach and the Domestic-Relationship Element</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/crime-of-domestic-violence-deportability-237-a-2-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/crime-of-domestic-violence-deportability-237-a-2-e/</guid><description>INA §237(a)(2)(E) makes a noncitizen LPR deportable for a single conviction of a crime of domestic violence, stalking, child abuse, or violation of a protective order. The categorical analysis is unforgiving.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>domestic-violence</category><category>deportability</category><category>categorical-approach</category><category>protective-order</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>F-1 STEM OPT — The 24-Month Extension, Form I-983, and the E-Verify Employer Rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-stem-opt-24-month-extension-i-983-e-verify/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/f-1-stem-opt-24-month-extension-i-983-e-verify/</guid><description>How an F-1 student on post-completion OPT extends work authorization by 24 months — the STEM degree list, E-Verify employer, I-983 training plan, and the reporting cadence that keeps the EAD valid.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>f-1</category><category>stem-opt</category><category>opt-extension</category><category>i-983</category><category>e-verify</category><category>i-765</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The &apos;Dates for Filing&apos; Toggle: When USCIS Lets You File I-485 Off the Earlier Chart</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-bulletin-date-for-filing-toggle-i-485/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-bulletin-date-for-filing-toggle-i-485/</guid><description>How USCIS decides each month whether I-485 applicants may use the Visa Bulletin&apos;s Dates for Filing chart rather than Final Action Dates — and what the answer changes about EAD timing and CSPA.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>dates-for-filing</category><category>final-action-dates</category><category>i-485</category><category>cspa</category><category>ead</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>L-1B Specialized Knowledge: Reading the 2015 USCIS Memo and How Adjudicators Apply It Today</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1b-specialized-knowledge-2015-uscis-memo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1b-specialized-knowledge-2015-uscis-memo/</guid><description>Inside USCIS&apos;s 2015 L-1B policy memorandum (PM-602-0111) and the AAO precedent that frames how &apos;specialized knowledge&apos; is adjudicated in current L-1B petitions.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>l-1b</category><category>specialized-knowledge</category><category>intracompany-transferee</category><category>uscis-memo</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>aao</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>H-1B Amendments After Matter of Simeio: When a Worksite Change Requires a New Petition</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-simeio-worksite-amendments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-simeio-worksite-amendments/</guid><description>How Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC, 26 I. &amp; N. Dec. 542 (AAO 2015) reshaped H-1B amendment practice — when an amended LCA isn&apos;t enough, the change-of-employment rules at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(2)(i)(E), and the short-term placement and &apos;non-worksite&apos; exceptions.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>h-1b</category><category>simeio</category><category>amendment</category><category>worksite</category><category>lca</category><category>214-2-h-2-i-e</category><category>655-735</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Parole-in-place for military families: discretionary grants under INA §212(d)(5) for spouses, children, and parents of U.S. service members</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/parole-in-place-military-families/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/parole-in-place-military-families/</guid><description>How USCIS exercises discretionary parole-in-place authority for immediate relatives of active-duty, reserve, and veteran U.S. military personnel — and what the operative Policy Manual chapter actually requires.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>parole-in-place</category><category>military-families</category><category>ina-212d5</category><category>pip</category><category>adjustment</category><category>immediate-relatives</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CSPA &apos;Sought to Acquire&apos; and Matter of O. Vazquez: What Counts Inside the One-Year Window</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/sought-to-acquire-matter-of-o-vazquez/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/sought-to-acquire-matter-of-o-vazquez/</guid><description>The BIA&apos;s holding in Matter of O. Vazquez on what it means to have &apos;sought to acquire&apos; LPR status within one year of CSPA visa availability — and how USCIS now applies it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cspa</category><category>sought-to-acquire</category><category>matter-of-o-vazquez</category><category>ina-203h</category><category>derivative</category><category>age-out</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-1B Outstanding Professor or Researcher: Six Criteria, Three-Year Experience, and the Tenure-Track Job Offer</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1b-outstanding-professor-researcher-six-criteria/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1b-outstanding-professor-researcher-six-criteria/</guid><description>How USCIS adjudicates EB-1B outstanding-professor-or-researcher petitions under INA § 203(b)(1)(B) and 8 CFR 204.5(i) — the six regulatory criteria, the international-recognition standard, and the employer&apos;s burden to document a qualifying permanent research position.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-1b</category><category>outstanding-researcher</category><category>outstanding-professor</category><category>i-140</category><category>priority-workers</category><category>kazarian</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-1A Extraordinary Ability: The 10 Regulatory Criteria and Kazarian&apos;s Two-Prong Review</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1a-extraordinary-ability-kazarian-two-prong-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1a-extraordinary-ability-kazarian-two-prong-review/</guid><description>How USCIS adjudicates EB-1A extraordinary-ability petitions under 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3) and the Ninth Circuit&apos;s two-step Kazarian framework — a practitioner&apos;s map to the ten criteria, the comparable-evidence rule, and the final-merits determination.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-1a</category><category>extraordinary-ability</category><category>kazarian</category><category>aao</category><category>i-140</category><category>priority-workers</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>H-1B Labor Condition Application: Wage Levels I–IV and the 10-Day Notice Posting Window</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-lca-wage-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-lca-wage-levels/</guid><description>How OFLC assigns H-1B wage levels I–IV on Form ETA-9035, the four attestations on the LCA, the 7-day filing window before a certified LCA can be used, and the 10-day worksite notice requirement at 20 CFR 655.734.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>h-1b</category><category>lca</category><category>eta-9035</category><category>wage-levels</category><category>prevailing-wage</category><category>655-731</category><category>655-734</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>PERM Prevailing Wage Determination: OFLC&apos;s Skill-Level Worksheet for Levels I–IV</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-pwd-oflc-skill-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-pwd-oflc-skill-levels/</guid><description>How OFLC&apos;s November 2009 Prevailing Wage Determination Policy Guidance assigns skill levels I, II, III, and IV to a PERM position, the five-factor worksheet, and how to write an ETA-9141 that survives the analysis.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>perm</category><category>prevailing-wage</category><category>eta-9141</category><category>skill-levels</category><category>oflc</category><category>soc</category><category>oewss</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Unlawful Presence: The 3-Year, 10-Year, and Permanent Bars Under INA §212(a)(9)(B) and (C)</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/unlawful-presence-three-ten-and-permanent-bars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/unlawful-presence-three-ten-and-permanent-bars/</guid><description>Unlawful presence is the trap that turns an overstay into a decade of re-entry bars. Here&apos;s how the 3-year, 10-year, and permanent bars accrue, what tolls them, and where the waivers fit.</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>unlawful-presence</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>waivers</category><category>i-601a</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Special Immigrant Visa (SIV): Iraqi and Afghan interpreters under the §1059 and §1244 frameworks</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/siv-iraqi-afghan-interpreters-1059-1244/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/siv-iraqi-afghan-interpreters-1059-1244/</guid><description>How the Special Immigrant Visa program admits Iraqi and Afghan nationals who served the U.S. mission, the distinct §1059, §1244, and §602(b) statutory authorities, and the path from chief-of-mission approval to LPR status.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>siv</category><category>iraqi-siv</category><category>afghan-siv</category><category>interpreters</category><category>chief-of-mission</category><category>adjustment</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-4 Special-Immigrant Religious Workers: The R-1 to I-360 Pathway and the September 2023 Settlement</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-4-special-immigrant-religious-workers-r-1-to-i-360/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-4-special-immigrant-religious-workers-r-1-to-i-360/</guid><description>How INA § 101(a)(27)(C) and 8 CFR 204.5(m) define special-immigrant religious workers — the two-year membership rule, the qualifying employer, the I-360 site-visit requirement, and the Ruiz-Diaz settlement&apos;s effect on AOS timing.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-4</category><category>special-immigrant</category><category>religious-worker</category><category>r-1</category><category>i-360</category><category>i-485</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>H-1B: Cap-Subject vs. Cap-Exempt Employers and the F-1 Cap-Gap Extension</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-cap-subject-vs-exempt-capgap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/h1b-cap-subject-vs-exempt-capgap/</guid><description>Who counts as cap-exempt under INA §214(g)(5), how the 65,000 + 20,000 H-1B cap works in practice, and how the cap-gap rule at 8 CFR 214.2(f)(5)(vi) keeps F-1 students working through October 1.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>h-1b</category><category>cap-exempt</category><category>cap-gap</category><category>f-1</category><category>opt</category><category>214g5</category><category>214-2-f-5-vi</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The Frivolous-Asylum Permanent Bar Under §208(d)(6): What Counts and How To Avoid Triggering It</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/frivolous-asylum-filing-208-d-6-permanent-bar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/frivolous-asylum-filing-208-d-6-permanent-bar/</guid><description>A finding of frivolous asylum under INA §208(d)(6) permanently bars all immigration benefits. The standard from Matter of Y-L- is procedural and substantive — both sides must be litigated.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>frivolous-asylum</category><category>i-589</category><category>permanent-bar</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-130 Petitioner Eligibility: What U.S. Citizens vs. LPRs Can Actually File</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-petitioner-citizen-vs-lpr-eligibility/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-130-petitioner-citizen-vs-lpr-eligibility/</guid><description>U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents both file Form I-130, but the relatives each can sponsor and the wait times look very different. Here is the breakdown.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-130</category><category>immediate-relative</category><category>family-preference</category><category>lpr</category><category>naturalization</category><category>adam-walsh</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>K-1 Fiancé(e) Visa: The 2-Year Meeting Rule and the 90-Day Marriage Clock</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/k-1-fiance-visa-2-year-meeting-90-day-marriage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/k-1-fiance-visa-2-year-meeting-90-day-marriage/</guid><description>The K-1 visa runs on two unforgiving deadlines — the two-year in-person meeting before filing, and the 90-day window to marry after admission. Both have narrow waivers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>k-1</category><category>fiance-visa</category><category>imbra</category><category>i-129f</category><category>adjustment-of-status</category><category>i-485</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-2 Schedule A: Nurses, Physical Therapists, and the Pre-Certified Labor Certification</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-schedule-a-nurses-physical-therapists-precertified-labor-cert/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-2-schedule-a-nurses-physical-therapists-precertified-labor-cert/</guid><description>How DOL&apos;s Schedule A regulation at 20 CFR 656.5 pre-certifies labor for registered nurses and physical therapists — and what employers must still file with USCIS under 8 CFR 204.5 to convert that pre-certification into an approved I-140.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-2</category><category>eb-3</category><category>schedule-a</category><category>labor-certification</category><category>nurses</category><category>physical-therapists</category><category>perm</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Surviving a PERM Audit: Recruitment File, Applicant Log, and the SVP/SOC Cross-Check</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-audit-response/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-audit-response/</guid><description>What DOL audit letters ask for under 20 CFR 656.20, how to assemble the recruitment file and applicant log, and why the SVP-to-SOC mapping has to line up.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>perm</category><category>audit</category><category>recruitment-file</category><category>applicant-log</category><category>svp</category><category>soc</category><category>656-20</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>PERM Denial Appeals: BALCA Review Timing and the 30-Day Reconsideration Window</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-balca-appeals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-balca-appeals/</guid><description>How to challenge a PERM denial under 20 CFR 656.24 and 656.26: the 30-day reconsideration window, the record on appeal, and what BALCA can and cannot do.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>perm</category><category>balca</category><category>appeal</category><category>reconsideration</category><category>656-24</category><category>656-26</category><category>oalj</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>PERM Supervised Recruitment: When DOL Takes Over the Process</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-supervised-recruitment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/perm-supervised-recruitment/</guid><description>How 20 CFR 656.21 supervised recruitment works, why DOL invokes it, and what the employer can and can&apos;t control once a Certifying Officer is driving the recruitment plan.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>perm</category><category>supervised-recruitment</category><category>656-21</category><category>oflc</category><category>certifying-officer</category><category>balca</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>L-1 Blanket vs Individual Petitions: When the §214(c)(2)(A) Blanket Pays Off</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1-blanket-vs-individual-petition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/l-1-blanket-vs-individual-petition/</guid><description>The L-1 blanket petition framework under INA §214(c)(2)(A), the qualifying-employer thresholds, and how the consular L visa path differs from an individual L-1 petition.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>l-1</category><category>l-1-blanket</category><category>intracompany-transferee</category><category>nonimmigrant</category><category>l-visa-reform-act</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-140 Ability to Pay: Audited Financials, Net Income, and the Net-Current-Assets Workaround</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i140-ability-to-pay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i140-ability-to-pay/</guid><description>How USCIS evaluates a sponsoring employer&apos;s ability to pay the proffered wage under 8 CFR 204.5(g)(2), the three accepted proofs, and the Matter of Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances escape hatch.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-140</category><category>ability-to-pay</category><category>204-5-g</category><category>sonegawa</category><category>audited-financials</category><category>net-current-assets</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The Petty-Offense Exception to CIMT Inadmissibility: INA §212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) Done Right</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/petty-offense-exception-to-cimt-inadmissibility/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/petty-offense-exception-to-cimt-inadmissibility/</guid><description>A single CIMT can survive inadmissibility if the maximum possible sentence was a year or less and the actual sentence was six months or less. Matter of Garcia-Hernandez sets the math.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cimt</category><category>petty-offense</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>i-485</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Child Status Protection Act: The § 203(h)(1) Age Calculation, Step by Step</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cspa-203h-age-calculation-formula/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/cspa-203h-age-calculation-formula/</guid><description>How CSPA&apos;s § 203(h)(1) formula freezes a derivative child&apos;s age — pending-petition time subtracted from age at visa availability — and the USCIS PM update that broadened it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cspa</category><category>ina-203h</category><category>child-status-protection-act</category><category>age-out</category><category>derivative</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The §212(c) Waiver After St. Cyr: A Pre-1996 Door That Is Still Open</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/212c-waiver-st-cyr-pre-1996-pleas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/212c-waiver-st-cyr-pre-1996-pleas/</guid><description>INS v. St. Cyr held that the §212(c) waiver remains available for noncitizens whose pre-IIRIRA guilty pleas were entered when the waiver was on the books. Twenty-five years later, the doctrine still controls a narrow but real slice of removal-defense work.</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>212c-waiver</category><category>st-cyr</category><category>pre-iirira</category><category>retroactivity</category><category>abdelghany</category><category>judulang</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>The K-3 Spouse Visa: When It Still Makes Sense (and When It Doesn&apos;t)</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/k-3-spouse-visa-when-it-still-makes-sense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/k-3-spouse-visa-when-it-still-makes-sense/</guid><description>Created by the LIFE Act as a shortcut for spouses waiting on I-130 adjudication, the K-3 is now administratively closed in most cases. Here is when it still has a real use.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>k-3</category><category>i-130</category><category>i-129f</category><category>spouse-visa</category><category>life-act</category><category>consular-processing</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Derived Citizenship Under the Child Citizenship Act of 2000: Automatic Acquisition Under INA §320</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/derived-citizenship-cca-2000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/derived-citizenship-cca-2000/</guid><description>The CCA 2000 made U.S. citizenship automatic for many LPR children of naturalized parents. Here is who qualified, who fell into the pre-2001 gap, and how to prove it now.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>derived-citizenship</category><category>cca-2000</category><category>ina-320</category><category>n-600</category><category>children</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Managing Visa Retrogression: AC21 H-1B Extensions, CSPA Age-Outs, and Section 204(j) Porting While EB-2 India Sits at 2013</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-retrogression-management-eb-2-india-priority-date-wait/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/visa-retrogression-management-eb-2-india-priority-date-wait/</guid><description>What practitioners and beneficiaries do during a multi-year priority-date wait — H-1B extensions beyond the sixth year under AC21 §§ 104(c) and 106(a), CSPA age-out calculations under INA § 203(h), I-485 portability under INA § 204(j), and reading the DOS Visa Bulletin.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>visa-retrogression</category><category>eb-2-india</category><category>ac21</category><category>cspa</category><category>204j-porting</category><category>visa-bulletin</category><category>h-1b</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Bond Redetermination After Matter of Adeniji: The Burden Is on the Detained Noncitizen</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/bond-redetermination-matter-of-adeniji/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/bond-redetermination-matter-of-adeniji/</guid><description>Matter of Adeniji, 22 I&amp;N Dec. 1102 (BIA 1999), placed the burden of proof in bond redetermination on the detained noncitizen. Twenty-five years later, the doctrine still controls daily IJ practice — within the limits Congress and the Supreme Court have since drawn.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>bond</category><category>custody</category><category>adeniji</category><category>ina-236</category><category>mandatory-detention</category><category>jennings</category><category>demore</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>I-601 Waiver: The Extreme-Hardship Standard Under Matter of Cervantes-Gonzalez</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-601-extreme-hardship-cervantes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/i-601-extreme-hardship-cervantes/</guid><description>How the BIA&apos;s Cervantes factors structure an I-601 waiver of inadmissibility — and what &apos;extreme hardship&apos; to a qualifying relative actually requires in 2026.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1999 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-601</category><category>waivers</category><category>extreme-hardship</category><category>matter-of-cervantes</category><category>inadmissibility</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>NACARA §203 Cancellation: A Narrowing Pool of Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Former Soviet Bloc Nationals</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/nacara-203-cancellation-narrowing-pool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/nacara-203-cancellation-narrowing-pool/</guid><description>Why NACARA §203 is still on the books in 2026, who can still file, and the special rules that make it more generous than ordinary cancellation.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1999 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>nacara</category><category>section-203</category><category>cancellation</category><category>salvadorans</category><category>guatemalans</category><category>soviet-bloc</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>CAT Protection: When Asylum Is Barred and Torture Is the Only Argument Left</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/convention-against-torture-cat-protection/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/convention-against-torture-cat-protection/</guid><description>How Convention Against Torture relief works in U.S. removal proceedings — the no-bars structure, the &apos;acquiescence&apos; element, and the difference between withholding and deferral.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>cat</category><category>convention-against-torture</category><category>deferral</category><category>withholding</category><category>removal-defense</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Aggravated Felonies: The §101(a)(43) Laundry List and the One-Year-Sentence Trigger</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/aggravated-felonies-101-a-43-and-the-one-year-sentence-trigger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/aggravated-felonies-101-a-43-and-the-one-year-sentence-trigger/</guid><description>INA §101(a)(43) defines 21 categories of &apos;aggravated felony&apos; for immigration purposes, and many turn on a one-year-or-more sentence imposed — not served. Here&apos;s how the trigger actually works.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1996 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>aggravated-felony</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>deportability</category><category>sentence</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-1C Multinational Manager or Executive: Qualifying Relationships and the One-Year-in-Three Abroad Rule</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1c-multinational-manager-executive-one-year-in-three/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-1c-multinational-manager-executive-one-year-in-three/</guid><description>How USCIS adjudicates EB-1C multinational-manager-or-executive petitions under INA § 203(b)(1)(C) and 8 CFR 204.5(j) — the qualifying-organization tests, the one-year-in-three abroad rule, and the managerial-vs-executive-capacity definitions at INA § 101(a)(44).</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-1c</category><category>multinational-manager</category><category>multinational-executive</category><category>i-140</category><category>priority-workers</category><category>l-1</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>EB-3 Skilled Worker, Professional, and Other Worker: The Three Splits and Why They Matter</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-3-skilled-professional-other-worker-splits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/eb-3-skilled-professional-other-worker-splits/</guid><description>How INA § 203(b)(3) and 8 CFR 204.5(l) divide EB-3 into three sub-classifications — skilled workers, professionals, and other workers — and why the split drives PERM minimum-requirements drafting, visa-bulletin movement, and the 10,000-per-year EW cap.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>eb-3</category><category>skilled-worker</category><category>professional</category><category>other-worker</category><category>perm</category><category>labor-certification</category><category>i-140</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-400 English and Civics Test: The 50/20 and 55/15 Exceptions, the 65/20 Special Consideration, and the N-648 Medical Disability Waiver</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-english-civics-test-n-648-medical-disability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-english-civics-test-n-648-medical-disability/</guid><description>Three statutory exemptions reshape the N-400 testing burden for older or disabled applicants. Here is what each requires and how the N-648 actually gets adjudicated.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-400</category><category>english-civics</category><category>n-648</category><category>medical-disability</category><category>senior-exception</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-400 Good Moral Character: The INA §101(f) Bars and the Statutory-Period Look-Back</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-good-moral-character-101f-bars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-good-moral-character-101f-bars/</guid><description>Good moral character is not a vibe — it is a statutory test with permanent bars, conditional bars, and a five-year look-back. Here is what USCIS actually reviews on the N-400.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-400</category><category>good-moral-character</category><category>naturalization</category><category>ina-101f</category><category>eligibility</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-400 Physical Presence: The Half-of-the-Statutory-Period Rule and How USCIS Actually Counts</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-physical-presence-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-physical-presence-rule/</guid><description>Physical presence is not continuous residence — it counts days inside U.S. borders. Here&apos;s how to compute the 30 (or 18) months and avoid the most common arithmetic mistakes.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-400</category><category>physical-presence</category><category>naturalization</category><category>eligibility</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-400 Naturalization: The Five-Year Rule, the Three-Year Spousal Exception, and Continuous Residence</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-statutory-period-continuous-residence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-400-statutory-period-continuous-residence/</guid><description>What the 5-year LPR clock and the 3-year spouse-of-citizen exception actually require, and how &apos;continuous residence&apos; breaks when you leave the country for too long.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-400</category><category>naturalization</category><category>continuous-residence</category><category>eligibility</category><category>lpr</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-565 Replacement of Naturalization or Citizenship Document: When to File, What It Replaces, and What It Will Not Fix</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-565-replacement-of-naturalization-document/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-565-replacement-of-naturalization-document/</guid><description>The N-565 replaces a lost, destroyed, mutilated, or name-changed naturalization or citizenship certificate. Here is what it does — and what requires a different form entirely.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-565</category><category>replacement</category><category>naturalization-certificate</category><category>citizenship-certificate</category><category>name-change</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>N-600 Certificate of Citizenship: Who Actually Needs One, Who Can Use a Passport Instead, and How USCIS Adjudicates</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-600-certificate-of-citizenship/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/n-600-certificate-of-citizenship/</guid><description>The certificate of citizenship documents acquired or derived citizenship — but it does not confer it. Here is when N-600 is the right form versus a U.S. passport or CRBA.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>n-600</category><category>certificate-of-citizenship</category><category>derived-citizenship</category><category>acquired-citizenship</category><category>documentation</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Dual Citizenship: What the State Department Actually Says, the Persistent Myth, and the Rules That Govern Loss of U.S. Nationality</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dual-citizenship-state-department-position/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/dual-citizenship-state-department-position/</guid><description>U.S. law tolerates dual citizenship — it does not encourage or prohibit it. Here is the actual DOS position, the INA §349 intent rule, and the practical complications dual citizens face.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1990 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>dual-citizenship</category><category>ina-349</category><category>expatriating-acts</category><category>multiple-nationality</category><category>state-department</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Material Misrepresentation Under §212(a)(6)(C)(i): The Kungys Standard and the I-601 Waiver Path</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/material-misrepresentation-212-a-6-c-i-and-the-i-601-waiver/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/material-misrepresentation-212-a-6-c-i-and-the-i-601-waiver/</guid><description>Material misrepresentation differs from false claim to citizenship — it&apos;s waivable. Kungys defines materiality, and Form I-601 is the path. Here&apos;s how the analysis works.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1988 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>misrepresentation</category><category>inadmissibility</category><category>i-601</category><category>waiver</category><category>crimmigration</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Acquired Citizenship at Birth Abroad: INA §301 Transmission and the Physical-Presence Math</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/acquired-citizenship-at-birth-abroad-ina-301/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/acquired-citizenship-at-birth-abroad-ina-301/</guid><description>How U.S. citizenship transmits to children born abroad under INA §301: the two-citizen-parent rule, the one-citizen-parent five-year-with-two-after-14 rule, and the proofs.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1986 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ina-301</category><category>acquired-citizenship</category><category>crba</category><category>transmission</category><category>physical-presence</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship: DS-4080, the Section 349(a)(5) Statutory Procedure, and the Exit-Tax Architecture</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/renunciation-of-us-citizenship-ds-4080/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/renunciation-of-us-citizenship-ds-4080/</guid><description>Formal renunciation is a statutory act under INA §349(a)(5) performed at a U.S. consulate. Here is the DS-4080 process, the irrevocability rules, and the IRC §877A exit-tax exposure.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1986 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>renunciation</category><category>ds-4080</category><category>ina-349</category><category>expatriation</category><category>exit-tax</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Marriage-Based Green Card Interviews: Stokes, Separation, and the Bona Fides Record</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/marriage-interview-stokes-bona-fides/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/marriage-interview-stokes-bona-fides/</guid><description>USCIS&apos;s Stokes-style separated interviews are the highest-stakes step in a marriage-based case. The bona fides record decides whether the case survives them.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>i-130</category><category>i-485</category><category>stokes-interview</category><category>marriage-fraud</category><category>imfa</category><category>bona-fides</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>Mandamus Against USCIS for Unreasonable Delay: 28 U.S.C. §1361, the TRAC Factors, and the APA §706(1) Companion Claim</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/mandamus-action-uscis-unreasonable-delay-28-usc-1361/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/mandamus-action-uscis-unreasonable-delay-28-usc-1361/</guid><description>When USCIS sits on a benefit request long past published processing times, federal mandamus under 28 U.S.C. §1361 paired with an APA §706(1) unlawfully-withheld claim is the tool. The TRAC factors decide who wins.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 1984 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>mandamus</category><category>28-usc-1361</category><category>apa-706-1</category><category>trac-factors</category><category>unreasonable-delay</category><category>federal-court</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item><item><title>INA §212(d)(3) Nonimmigrant Waiver: The Matter of Hranka Factors</title><link>https://articles.folaform.com/articles/212d3-nonimmigrant-waiver-matter-of-hranka/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://articles.folaform.com/articles/212d3-nonimmigrant-waiver-matter-of-hranka/</guid><description>How DOS and CBP weigh the §212(d)(3) discretionary nonimmigrant waiver — and how the BIA&apos;s three Hranka factors structure every recommendation.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 1978 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>212d3</category><category>nonimmigrant-waiver</category><category>matter-of-hranka</category><category>consular-processing</category><category>sao</category><author>Fola Editorial</author></item></channel></rss>