The Department of Homeland Security published an interim final rule effective immediately that permits U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to refer certain affirmative asylum applications to the Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review without interview. The rule fundamentally alters the affirmative asylum process by removing a longstanding requirement to interview applicants before referring cases to immigration court.
What changed
DHS is removing references to a “right” to an interview, and language that an asylum officer shall review and determine any prohibitions on filing “in an interview,” while retaining the interview procedures outlined in the regulations if an asylum interview is offered by USCIS.
DHS is also removing the requirement that a letter communicating the basis for referral of asylum include an assessment of the alien’s credibility.
DHS is amending its regulations to permit an asylum officer to refer an affirmative asylum application to EOIR based on the record and other evidence. Consistent with this change in practice, DHS is removing conflicting language in pre-existing regulations that reference a “right” to an interview and language that an asylum officer shall review and determine any prohibitions on filing “in an interview.” DHS is also removing the requirement that a letter communicating the basis for referral of asylum include an assessment of the alien’s credibility.
The interim final rule is effective July 28, 2026, and written comments must be submitted on or before September 28, 2026.
Why it matters
This rule reshapes affirmative asylum adjudication. USCIS estimates more than 444,000 pending asylum applicants could be affected by the rule, with about 132,000 future applications for asylum could be impacted.
Federal asylum officers can deny interviews to asylum seekers and send them immediately to an immigration judge under the rule, which allows USCIS to refer directly to immigration judges certain asylum cases — such as noncitizens who are not yet in deportation proceedings and are proactively seeking asylum — without first conducting an interview or including a referral letter to the judge regarding the applicant’s credibility.
For practitioners advising clients, the shift is significant: it could create weakened asylum claims before immigration judges, resulting in quick denials and orders of removal. Cases that would have received an initial interview from a trained asylum officer now proceed directly to the adversarial immigration court setting, where applicants have a second chance to present evidence and testimony.
The rule applies only to affirmative asylum applications (those filed proactively by applicants not yet in removal proceedings) and does not affect defensive asylum claims raised during removal proceedings.
Way forward
-
If you represent pending affirmative asylum applicants: Review your client’s case status immediately. If your client’s application is still pending and involves issues like untimely filing (past the one-year deadline), bars to asylum, or discretionary concerns, USCIS may refer without interview. Prepare a comprehensive affidavit and declaration for immigration court that anticipates questions an asylum officer would have asked.
-
For new intakes: Brief clients that affirmative applications may not receive an interview prior to EOIR referral. Ensure your intake captures all material facts; the written record is now critical.
-
Monitor the comment period: The interim final rule accepts written comments on or before September 28, 2026. Consider submitting public comments on behalf of your practice or organization.
-
Verify the primary source: All practitioners should review the Federal Register notice directly for the complete regulatory text and policy justification.
Disclaimer
This article is not legal advice. It is educational material prepared by a software company, not a law firm, and does not substitute for the advice of a licensed immigration attorney. Asylum law is fact-intensive and jurisdiction-specific; immigration policy can change without notice. Always verify guidance against the primary source document linked above and consult a qualified immigration attorney before taking action on behalf of a client or in your own case.