USCIS removal defense

Federal Court Strikes Down USCIS Immigration Freezes Based on Nationality

A Rhode Island federal judge vacated four Trump-era USCIS policies freezing asylum and immigration benefits for applicants from 39 designated countries, finding them arbitrary and unlawful.

A federal judge in Rhode Island struck down Trump administration immigration policies that had halted asylum applications and frozen immigration and citizenship applications, work permits, and green cards for immigrants from 39 African, Asian, Latin American, and Middle Eastern countries. In a 135-page opinion, US District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. said the policies had thrown countless immigrants living in the United States into “indeterminate legal limbo,” solely because of their nationality.

What changed

The 135-page ruling struck down four Trump administration policies, including a global asylum hold; a benefits hold on work permits, green cards, and naturalizations; a comprehensive review policy to look at already-decided cases; and the country-specific ban, which required officers to treat certain nationalities as riskier. USCIS implemented the policies late last year and early this year, in response to directives from the White House.

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services had justified its actions with “pretextual concerns of ‘national security’ that mask anti-immigrant sentiments that it is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making,” the judge wrote.

Why it matters

The decision has immediate, nationwide scope. Affirmative asylum interviews and decisions should resume nationwide. Adjustment, work permit, travel document, and naturalization cases that were paused under categorical country-based holds should return to ordinary case processing. The judge also said officers cannot treat all individuals from particular countries as having an increased national security risk.

If you are representing clients from the 39 designated countries whose cases were frozen, those freezes are now lifted. Previously approved cases also cannot be reopened solely because of nationality or an entry date tied to those policies. The ruling does not guarantee outcomes for applicants, only that their cases will be processed.

Way forward

  • Check your pending cases. If any client’s asylum, adjustment, work permit, travel document, or naturalization application was pending under the freeze, prepare to move forward immediately. USCIS must resume ordinary processing.
  • Do not stipulate to negative nationality factors. Officers can no longer rely on the vacated guidance treating country of origin as a discretionary negative factor. Challenge any decisions citing nationality as a reason for denial.
  • Monitor appeal timelines. The Department of Homeland Security has not announced whether it will appeal this ruling. If it does, the injunction remains in effect pending appeal. If no appeal is filed, the judgment stands.
  • Advise clients of processing timeline uncertainty. While the freeze is lifted, USCIS processing times remain estimates that vary by form, office, and case history. Encourage clients to track case status and consider congressional inquiries if delays persist.

Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Fola is a software company, not a law firm. Immigration law is complex and changes rapidly; you should consult a licensed immigration attorney to understand how this ruling applies to your specific situation. Always verify your understanding against the primary sources linked above. This ruling may be appealed or subject to further proceedings.

Was this article helpful?

Related articles

Browse all →
USCIS

Federal Court Blocks USCIS Asylum and Country-Based Application Freezes

removal defense
USCIS

Federal Court Vacates Country-Based USCIS Adjudication Holds

removal defense
USCIS

Federal Court Strikes Down USCIS Processing Ban for Travel Ban Countries

removal defense