DOJ-EOIR policy update

Federal Court Strikes Down Kansas In-State Tuition Law

A federal judge ruled that Kansas's 22-year-old law allowing in-state tuition for undocumented students violates federal immigration law, after the DOJ and state attorney general agreed to a consent decree eliminating the benefit.

A federal judge struck down Kansas’s longstanding law allowing in-state college tuition for undocumented students. U.S. District Judge Holly L. Teeter ruled that the Kansas statute violates federal immigration law, granting a joint consent judgment requested by the U.S. Department of Justice and Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach.

What changed

Enforcement of the Kansas statute is permanently blocked across all state public colleges and universities. The 2004 state law allowed people without lawful immigration status to be considered residents for purposes of tuition and fees. Under the law, certain students without lawful immigration status who attended and graduated from Kansas high schools and met other requirements qualified for regular tuition rates at public colleges and universities.

The federal government sued Kansas on June 24, 2026, and the state immediately agreed to a consent decree declaring the law invalid. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly and the advocacy organization Kansas Students for Affordable Tuition moved to intervene to defend the law, arguing the state attorney general failed to represent the state’s interests, but this motion was denied.

Why it matters

The court ruled that federal law overrides state law because the state law grants a postsecondary education benefit for students who lack lawful immigration status based on state-defined residency criteria without making the same benefit available to all U.S. citizens and nationals. Federal law prohibits states from granting postsecondary education benefits to undocumented immigrants based on state residency unless the same tuition rates are offered to all U.S. citizens regardless of which state they live in.

This ruling affects immigration practitioners advising clients on higher education access and eligibility. If you represent undocumented students or their families in Kansas, you can no longer rely on the in-state tuition exemption. Since President Donald Trump retook office, the DOJ has sued 17 states over laws that allow noncitizen students who meet certain requirements to access in-state tuition, and courts have already struck down the laws in five of those cases—targeting Texas, Kentucky, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Illinois. The Kansas decision aligns with this broader federal litigation strategy.

Way forward

  • Review client eligibility: If you have clients currently receiving in-state tuition under Kansas law, their status may change. Advise them to contact their institution immediately to understand how the ruling affects their enrollment and financial obligations.

  • Monitor appeals and interventions: While the court denied Governor Kelly’s and Kansas Students for Affordable Tuition’s intervention motions, watch for any appeals or further legal action that could stay or reverse the ruling.

  • Check comparable state law: If you represent students relocating or considering enrollment in other states with in-state tuition policies for undocumented students, verify the legal status of those laws, as similar DOJ litigation is pending nationwide.

  • Document client circumstances: For undocumented students currently enrolled under the now-unenforceable law, preserve records of their prior eligibility and enrollment status, as they may be relevant to future immigration proceedings or appeals.

Disclaimer

This article is not legal advice. Fola Editorial is a software company, not a law firm. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney or accredited representative to discuss your specific situation and verify this information against the primary court decision. Policy decisions and litigation can change without notice, and you should confirm the current legal status of Kansas in-state tuition law and any related proceedings with counsel before advising clients.

Was this article helpful?

Related articles

Browse all →
DOJ-EOIR

Federal court voids Illinois in-state tuition law for undocumented students

policy update
OTHER

5th Circuit denies effort to defend Texas Dream Act in-state tuition law

policy update
DOJ-EOIR

Federal Judge Blocks New York's Mask Ban for Federal Agents, Upholds 287(g) Prohibition

policy update