A federal judge ordered major changes to conditions at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in San Bernardino County, granting a preliminary injunction that requires federal immigration officials provide people with clean drinking water and adequate medical care. U.S. District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes ruled that detainees who brought the lawsuit “demonstrated they are likely to prevail” on their claims that conditions at the facility violate Fifth Amendment protections against inhumane conditions of confinement.
What changed
The court granted a preliminary injunction on grounds that detainees are likely to succeed on their Fifth Amendment claims and could suffer irreparable harm without court intervention.
Judge Sykes ordered 24-hour access to clean drinking water, meals with sufficient calories, and soap and hygiene products free of charge, as well as daily facility cleansing and mold identification and removal.
The court ordered Adelanto to perform at least two headcounts every day, once overnight and once during the day, to ensure detainees are present and not incapacitated.
The court also ordered restrictions on sending detainees to isolation, barring a life safety risk to staff or if the detainee requests it.
On medical care: The order requires all detainees be given an intake screening upon arrival for physical or mental illnesses, with ongoing treatment and medication, and mandates that every detainee must have access to primary, secondary, and tertiary medical care and be advised of their patient rights.
Judge Sykes ordered that the government must provide two independent monitors for the duration of the lawsuit to ensure compliance with court orders, and detainees must be given the opportunity to submit grievances to the monitors in English or Spanish contained in a lockbox only accessible to the monitors.
Why it matters
This ruling binds ICE and the facility contractor (GEO Group) to enforce specific minimum standards of detention conditions in real time—not at some future date. The ruling requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other named defendants to immediately provide detainees with the condition upgrades the judge ordered.
For practitioners representing clients detained at Adelanto, the order provides concrete evidence of what a court has found to be constitutionally required conditions. If your client is subjected to violations of these orders—denied clean water, refused medical care, subjected to improper isolation, or denied headcount verification—you now have a federal court judgment to cite in habeas petitions, bond hearings, or appeals. The presence of independent court-appointed monitors creates a parallel documentation trail.
The suit arose after two deaths at the facility within weeks of each other last fall: Ismael Ayala-Uribe, a 39-year-old former DACA recipient, and 56-year-old Gabriel Garcia-Aviles, both still under federal investigation. This ruling does not limit future litigation over the deaths themselves or other damages claims—it simply establishes baseline conditions that must be met immediately.
Way forward
-
If your client is currently detained at Adelanto: Review the complete order from the source link above and document any violations of the mandated conditions (water access, hygiene supplies, headcounts, medical screening, isolation restrictions). Preserve those facts for habeas corpus, bond review, or appeal arguments.
-
If you represent detained clients at other ICE facilities: This ruling may be persuasive authority in your jurisdiction. Consult local federal case law on conditions of confinement; this Adelanto order may support similar motions at other sites.
-
Monitor compliance: The court-appointed independent monitors will file reports. Request copies from the court docket or through FOIA requests to track whether ICE and GEO Group are meeting the order’s deadlines.
-
Notify clients and family members: If you represent someone at Adelanto, advise them of their right to file grievances with the independent monitors via the lockbox mechanism. Ensure they understand the order does not guarantee release—it mandates facility conditions during detention.
Disclaimer
We are a software company and news outlet, not a law firm. This article is not legal advice. Do not rely on it as a substitute for consultation with a licensed immigration attorney or qualified legal representative. Court orders can be modified, stayed, or reversed on appeal; policy can change without notice. Please verify the current status of this order and all citations against the primary source linked above and consult with counsel about your specific case.