A federal judge has appointed an independent monitor to oversee conditions for children in immigration detention, citing numerous violations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection under the Trump administration. Judge Dolly Gee appointed the monitor to conduct unannounced visits and track compliance at Dilley and border detention cells for at least a year, paid for by the government. This enforcement action targets prolonged detention that has violated the decades-old Flores Settlement Agreement binding on federal custodians.
What changed
In mid-August, Gee, who oversees the settlement, appointed an independent monitor to conduct unannounced visits and track compliance at Dilley and border detention cells for at least a year, paid for by the government. In her order, Gee wrote that children have been detained for more than 20 days on average for five consecutive months.
Judge Gee warned Trump administration attorneys in June that she was displeased with the prolonged detention of kids at Dilley. She noted cases of minors confined for 50 days, 91 days or even 323 days. This pattern—holding children well beyond the 20-day limit set by the 1997 consent decree—prompted Gee to authorize independent monitoring as an enforcement mechanism.
The Trump administration is trying to end the agreement, arguing in court that it’s “outdated” and “judicial micromanagement” of its immigration policy. The appointment of an independent monitor signals that Gee will not tolerate non-compliance while that legal challenge proceeds.
Why it matters
For practitioners representing detained children or families, this order means a new layer of oversight is in place. The independent monitor will conduct unannounced facility visits, generating reports and data that practitioners can cite to challenge conditions, oppose prolonged detention, or support habeas motions. Judge Dolly M. Gee in California, who oversees the Flores settlement, said in a court hearing in June she plans to appoint a monitor to force the Trump administration to comply with the agreement.
This also undercuts any government argument that Flores is merely symbolic. Gee’s order treats the 20-day limit and housing/medical/sanitation standards as enforceable obligations, not policy preferences. The fact that the Trump administration has sought to terminate Flores—both in 2019 and again now—makes this monitor appointment a high-stakes reminder that federal courts will intervene to block evasion.
If you have a client held beyond 20 days, the monitor’s documentation becomes critical evidence of systematic non-compliance, strengthening motions to release or arguments for expedited adjudication.
Way forward
-
Review your detained client’s length of stay. If your client has been held more than 20 days, gather documentation (detainer notices, facility records, medical reports) to build a release motion citing Gee’s finding of persistent violations.
-
Cite the monitor order. When opposing detention or challenging conditions (food, water, medical care, segregation), reference the federal court’s explicit finding of ICE/CBP non-compliance and the appointment of independent oversight. This signals to the government that courts are watching.
-
Request monitor reports. Once the monitor begins visits and issues reports, file motions or FOIA requests to obtain copies. These reports may document conditions or patterns that support relief for your client.
-
Track appeals. The case is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay alert to 9th Circuit rulings on whether Flores remains binding; the Trump administration will likely appeal Gee’s monitor order.
Disclaimer
This article is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. We are a technology platform, not a law firm. Consult a licensed immigration attorney to discuss your specific circumstances and verify the status of the Flores Settlement Agreement and all court orders against primary sources. Immigration policy and judicial rulings are subject to change without notice; always confirm the current state of the law before filing or advising clients.