A federal judge on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s administration had adopted a series of unlawful policies that barred people from 39 countries from receiving decisions on applications for asylum, work permits, green cards and citizenship. The lawsuit was filed in March by a coalition of immigrant service organizations and labor unions challenging policies adopted starting in November by USCIS.
What changed
USCIS placed a hold on processing immigration benefit applications from people in the 39 countries subject to Trump’s full or partial travel bans, which the administration has justified on vetting and security grounds. Countries subject to full travel bans included Afghanistan, Iran, Haiti, Somalia, Venezuela and Syria.
Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island, struck down the policies, saying they left people from dozens of African, Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern countries in “indeterminate legal limbo” and were adopted without statutory and regulatory authority and based on “anti-immigrant sentiments” that the agency is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making.
The judge wrote: “USCIS’s hold on adjudications cannot be attributed to anything that these individuals did wrong; rather, it arises solely by the happenstance of their birth.” He said the immigrants had adhered to the legal processes Congress had enacted and USCIS had adopted by regulation, yet had been “stuck waiting, for months on end, for benefit requests that USCIS refuses to adjudicate.”
Why it matters
This binding federal court order directs USCIS to resume adjudicating pending asylum applications, I-485 (adjustment of status), I-131 (advance parole / work permit), I-539 (extension / change of status), and N-400 (naturalization) cases for nationals of the 39 affected countries. The freeze had created a de facto moratorium—applicants whose cases were pending faced indefinite delays regardless of case strength or eligibility.
For practitioners, this means:
- Pending cases that were stuck in administrative limbo may now be scheduled for interviews, decisions, or final adjudication.
- The court has explicitly rejected the administration’s authority to impose blanket country-based holds on benefit processing.
- USCIS cannot use national origin as a substitute for individual case-by-case adjudication under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The ruling exposes the agency’s vulnerability to judicial challenge on statutory interpretation grounds—something the government may appeal.
Way forward
-
Review your pending caseload immediately. Identify all clients with applications pending for nationals of the 39 affected countries (Afghanistan, Iran, Haiti, Somalia, Venezuela, Syria, and the 33 others). Expect USCIS to begin processing these cases, and prepare for possible interview calls or decision notices.
-
Prepare to update clients on case status. USCIS may issue a directive to field offices to resume adjudication. Request updated I-797 receipt notices or case status checks via myUSCIS to confirm your clients are no longer subject to the hold.
-
Monitor for government appeal. DHS may seek to appeal this decision or ask for a stay. Watch for Federal Register notices or circuit court filings. Your ability to advise clients on next steps depends on the government’s response.
-
Document the hold and adjudication delay. Keep records of when the freeze was imposed and when USCIS resumes processing, as this may affect accrual of time for asylum, bona fide marriage, or other time-based benefits.
Disclaimer
This article explains a recent federal court ruling and is not legal advice. The analysis reflects a plain-language summary of the decision and publicly available reporting. You should consult with a licensed immigration attorney about your specific case or filing strategy. Immigration policy and court precedent can change without notice. Always verify against the primary source linked above and monitor USCIS guidance for any directive on how it will comply with this ruling.