On May 21, 2026, USCIS issued a new policy memo asserting that adjustment of status is an exceptional form of relief. The agency is characterizing the memo as a return to statutory intent, but the practical effect is seismic: aliens in the U.S. temporarily wanting a green card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances. If you represent adjustment applicants—whether currently filed or in planning stages—this memo reshapes your case strategy, your client’s risk profile, and your obligation to warn of pending uncertainty.
What changed
USCIS issued policy memorandum PM-602-0199 concerning green card applications filed within the United States. The memo reframes adjustment of status (I-485) from a standard pathway available to eligible temporary visa holders into a discretionary form of relief available only in “extraordinary circumstances.”
Previously, foreign nationals who were in the U.S. legally on a temporary basis could apply for a green card without having to return to their home country first—a process known as “adjustment of status”. USCIS said that this process should only be allowed in “extraordinary circumstances” and that most green card applicants would need to leave the U.S. to apply from their home country via consular processing.
USCIS framed its memo as a return to the “original intent of the law”—a stance that some law firms and immigration advocacy groups expect will be challenged in court. However, USCIS asserts that this interpretation is consistent with Congress’ intent, but this is not a widely accepted interpretation of the law. Congress created the adjustment of status process in 1952 and has amended that section more than 20 times in the decades since. At no time has Congress written this “extraordinary discretionary relief” standard into the law that USCIS is now claiming Congress intended all along.
Why it matters
Immediate practitioner exposure. The agency still has not clarified through formal policy or guidance whether this memo is supposed to apply to adjustment of status applications already filed, or whether it will apply only to new applications. Yet there are recent reports from attorneys representing noncitizens with pending adjustment applications that their clients are being asked to demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances” per the memo. If your client filed an I-485 before May 21, you cannot yet assume it is immune from this new framework.
Discretion becomes the adjudicative center. USCIS officers are directed to weigh both positive and negative factors when reviewing I-485 applications, and officers now expect applicants to bring affirmative evidence of their good character, community ties, and contributions to the United States. What once was a largely ministerial check against statutory bars is now a broad totality-of-circumstances discretionary call.
Vague standards create risk for pending cases. NAFSA’s counsel requested further clarification from USCIS regarding what parameters will constitute serving the national interest or providing an economic benefit, and noted that USCIS has failed to clarify what impact the memo will have on green card applicants from the 75 countries in which the Trump administration has stopped issuing new immigrant visas.
Legal challenges are expected but outcomes unclear. The memo is likely to face legal challenges given substantial disagreement with USCIS’ assertion that this policy is consistent with the law as enacted by Congress. The agency has changed substantive policy without providing advance notice and an opportunity to comment through rulemaking. However, the outcome of such a court case—or whether USCIS would be allowed to implement the policy while a lawsuit is underway—is not at all clear.
Way forward
-
Review all pending I-485 cases immediately. Determine which have already been interviewed and which remain in initial review. Request expedited or privileged status on pre-May 21 filings where possible. Document the filing date and all correspondence for litigation support if the memo is later enjoined.
-
Assess “extraordinary circumstances” factors for each client. Consult USCIS’s policy memo for the full list of favorable discretionary factors. If your client has employment-based sponsorship, strong family ties, or demonstrable community contribution, begin gathering contemporaneous evidence now—requests for evidence are likely coming to pending cases.
-
Advise clients of bifurcation risk. Prepare clients for the possibility that an I-130 petition may be approved while the I-485 application is held pending clarification of USCIS’s operational guidance. Advise them not to resign employment, sell property, or make irreversible moves pending final adjudication.
-
Monitor litigation and USCIS guidance. Multiple bar associations and advocacy organizations have challenged the memo or filed amicus briefs. Courts may enjoin or limit its application. In the interim, any formal USCIS guidance (e.g., addenda to the Policy Manual) will narrow uncertainty. Check the USCIS newsroom and your professional networks weekly for updates.
Disclaimer
This article is written by a software company for public information and practitioner reference. It is not legal advice. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney for case-specific guidance. Immigration policy changes frequently and without notice; verify all claims against the primary source linked above and check the official USCIS policy memo before filing or advising clients. The legal status and enforcement of this memo remain uncertain and subject to ongoing litigation.