On August 15, 2025, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0188, titled “Restoring a Rigorous, Holistic, and Comprehensive Good Moral Character Evaluation Standard for Aliens Applying for Naturalization.” This marks a fundamental shift in how adjudicators assess the “good moral character” (GMC) requirement—a cornerstone of eligibility for U.S. citizenship. You must now prepare naturalization cases with this new standard in mind.
What changed
Evaluating GMC involves more than a cursory mechanical review focused on the absence of wrongdoing. Under the old approach, USCIS officers often applied a narrow checklist: no disqualifying crimes, taxes paid, dependents supported—and if you cleared those bars, approval followed. That practice has ended.
USCIS directed officers to apply a rigorous, holistic “totality of the circumstances” review when deciding Good Moral Character for naturalization. Officers must now consider not only any negative conduct but also affirmative, positive contributions you can document—community involvement, family responsibilities, steady lawful work, education, and tax compliance, among others.
USCIS officers must account for individuals’ positive attributes, not only the absence of misconduct, when making a determination about whether the applicant has met the requirement of establishing good moral character. USCIS officers must consider an individual’s positive attributes and contributions, such as community involvement, family responsibilities, educational attainment, and compliance with tax obligations, in good moral character determinations.
Conditional bars (e.g., multiple DUIs, controlled substance violations, false claims to U.S. citizenship) will still apply—but can now be evaluated alongside rehabilitation evidence. This is critical: even applicants with past adverse conduct now have a pathway to present evidence of genuine reform and changed circumstances.
Why it matters
This policy fundamentally changes your litigation and advisory strategy. Under the old checklist model, many practitioners told clients: “You have no criminal history, so you’ll be fine.” That advice is now incomplete and potentially harmful.
For clients with clean records: You can no longer coast on absence of wrongdoing. USCIS now expects individuals to demonstrate civic virtue, responsibility, and affirmative contributions to society. Applicants who might previously have relied on the absence of problems in their background should now consider developing a stronger record of positive evidence to present the best possible case for approval. Officers will actively scrutinize what you have done—not just what you haven’t done.
For clients with conditional bars or past issues: Evidence of genuine reform can weigh in favor of an applicant. An applicant who had a DUI 10 years ago, completed counseling, and has been sober for a decade now has grounds to argue rehabilitation outweighs the violation—provided you build the evidentiary record.
For adjudicators: The August 2025 memoranda appear to provide USCIS adjudicators with more discretion and flexibility in deciding who is worthy of U.S. citizenship. Whether or not a naturalization applicant demonstrates enough “virtue” is now in the hands of the individual USCIS officers conducting the naturalization examination. This introduces more subjectivity into the process—and means your narrative framing, documentation, and presentation matter more than ever.
Increased RFEs and interviews: Applicants might expect more thorough background reviews that go beyond criminal record checks, as well as potential delays if the USCIS officer requires additional documentation to evaluate the applicant’s moral character.
Way forward
-
Audit your I-N-400 strategy immediately. Begin gathering evidence of positive contributions now: letters from employers, community organizations, places of worship, schools where the applicant volunteers or teaches; tax returns showing consistent filing; evidence of family caregiving, educational degrees or certificates, rental/mortgage payment history. Do not rely on the absence of problems.
-
For applicants with adverse conduct, commission a personal statement and supporting affidavits that address the conduct head-on, explain the circumstances, detail steps taken to reform, and demonstrate current alignment with community values. Have the applicant’s attorney vet the narrative before filing.
-
Document rehabilitation actively. If the applicant had a DUI, controlled-substance violation, or other conditional bar, gather evidence of counseling completion, ongoing sobriety/compliance, employment since the incident, and community engagement. Don’t assume the officer will infer rehabilitation from silence.
-
Read the full policy memorandum. The policy is titled “Restoring a Rigorous, Holistic, and Comprehensive Good Moral Character Evaluation Standard for Aliens Applying for Naturalization.” Access it via the USCIS website and brief yourself on the full factors and examples officers are instructed to consider.
Disclaimer
This article is provided by Fola Editorial, a software company—not a law firm—and does not constitute legal advice. The information is current as of the publication date but immigration policy can change without notice. Always verify the memorandum text against the official USCIS source, consult a licensed immigration attorney regarding your specific case, and update your practice procedures as USCIS issues clarifying guidance or related memoranda.