#rfe

Tagged #rfe

Every article we've published on this topic, sorted by the agency's own announcement date.

OTHER

USCIS Restores Officer Discretion to Deny Cases Without Prior RFE or NOID

USCIS policy update on evidentiary standards clarifies officers can now deny incomplete benefit requests without first issuing a Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny.

policy update
USCIS

USCIS Expands Authority to Deny Filings Without Request for Evidence

USCIS Policy Alert PA-2026-05 eliminates the expectation of RFE/NOID consideration and grants adjudicators full discretion to deny incomplete filings. Effective immediately, it reshapes filing completeness expectations.

policy update
USCIS

USCIS Policy Alert PA-2026-05: Officers Can Now Deny Cases Without RFE for Missing Initial Evidence

USCIS revises evidence and RFE/NOID guidance effective immediately. Officers may now deny benefit requests without issuing an RFE or NOID if required initial evidence is missing or eligibility is not established at filing.

policy update
USCIS

USCIS Policy Alert: Officers Must Suggest DNA Testing in Family-Based Cases

USCIS requires adjudicators to suggest DNA testing when primary evidence of genetic relationships is unavailable, unreliable, or insufficient. Understand the new mandatory guidance and how it affects RFEs.

family based
OTHER

USCIS Tightens Evidence Standards for Initial Filings

USCIS has revised its policy to allow denial of incomplete applications without issuing a Request for Evidence, effective immediately for pending and newly filed cases.

policy update
USCIS

USCIS NOID vs RFE: When the Agency Issues a Notice of Intent to Deny Instead of a Request for Evidence

An RFE means the record is light. A NOID means USCIS has already formed an adverse view. The two instruments demand different responses — and missing the distinction sinks otherwise winnable cases.

policy update 7 min
USCIS

Responding to a USCIS RFE Under 8 CFR §103.2(b)(8): A Focused, Evidence-Only Playbook

An RFE is not a chance to re-argue the case. It is a discrete evidentiary ask under 8 CFR §103.2(b)(8). Here is how to answer one without drifting.

policy update 7 min